Notes of Decisions
Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. United States Forest Serv., 593 F.3d 923 (9th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 6× “iffs-Appellants Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society (collectively, "HCPC" or "plaintiffs") brought suit against the United States Forest Service ("Forest Service" or "Service"), seeking a judgment declaring: (1) that the Forest Service has failed to…”
Potlatch Corp. v. United States, 12 P.3d 1260 (Idaho 2000).
· cites it 12× “[2] See 16 U.S.C. §§ 460gg (1)-(13). Additionally, the United States claimed reserved water rights in the Boise, Payette, Clearwater, Nez Perce, Sawtooth, and Salmon-Challis National Forests under the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act (MUSYA) (Subcase No.”
Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. United States Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683 (9th Cir. 2005).
· cites it 2× “1117 (1975), 16 U.S.C. §§ 460gg et seq. The HCNRA includes the “Hells Canyon Wilderness,” which is defined as the area “depicted on the map entitled ‘Hells Canyon National Recreation Area’ dated May 1978, 1 which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the…”
Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. Richmond, 841 F. Supp. 1039 (D. Or. 1993).
· cites it 3× “§§ 551 — 559 and the Hells Canyon *1042 National Recreation Area Act (“HCNRA Act”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 460gg to -13, to obtain declaratory and injunctive relief requiring defendant the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) to promulgate rules governing uses of the Hells…”
Oregon Nat. Resources Council v. Lyng, 882 F.2d 1417 (9th Cir. 1989).
“The specified purpose of the HCNRA Act is “[t]o assure that the natural beauty, and historical and archeological values” of this area “are preserved for this and future generations, and that the recreational and ecologic values and public enjoyment of the area are thereby…”
Hells Canyon All. v. United States Forest Serv., 227 F.3d 1170 (9th Cir. 2000).
· cites it 3× “Hells Canyon Act § 1(a), 16 U.S.C. § 460gg(a). Included in the Hells Canyon NRA was the Hells Canyon Wilderness, as well as 71 miles of the Snake River.”
Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. United States Forest Serv., 883 F. Supp. 534 (D. Or. 1995).
“94-199,16 U.S.C. § 460gg et seq. (the “Act”). The Act directed the Secretary of Agriculture to administer the recreation area in a manner compatible with several objectives, including “the continuation of such existing uses and developments as are compatible with the provisions…”
Appalachian Power Co. v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 398 (Ct. Cl. 1979).
“1117 , establishing the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area, 16 U.S.C. § 460gg et seq. The Asotin Dam, authorized under provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1962, Pub.”
United States v. 16.92 Acres of Land, 670 F.2d 1369 (7th Cir. 1982).
“An example where Congress specifically ruled out condemnation as a method of property acquisition is found in the Hells Canyon National Recreation Area Act, 16 U.S.C. § 460gg (1975). In this Act, the Secretary was authorized to purchase land “with donated or *1372 appropriated…”
Stewart v. US Ex Rel. Dept. of Agric., 639 F. Supp. 2d 1190 (D. Or. 2009).
“§ 551 (providing authority to protect against destruction by fire and other degradation upon the national forests), 16 U.S.C. § 460gg (providing authority to regulate privately owned property within the Hells Canyon Recreation Area), and 16 U.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 460gg(1) — 1 case
Potlatch Corp. v. United States, 12 P.3d 1260 (Idaho 2000).
“[2] See 16 U.S.C. §§ 460gg (1)-(13). Additionally, the United States claimed reserved water rights in the Boise, Payette, Clearwater, Nez Perce, Sawtooth, and Salmon-Challis National Forests under the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act (MUSYA) (Subcase No.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 460gg(a) — 5 cases
Potlatch Corp. v. United States, 12 P.3d 1260 (Idaho 2000).
“[2] See 16 U.S.C. §§ 460gg (1)-(13). Additionally, the United States claimed reserved water rights in the Boise, Payette, Clearwater, Nez Perce, Sawtooth, and Salmon-Challis National Forests under the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act (MUSYA) (Subcase No.”
Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. Richmond, 841 F. Supp. 1039 (D. Or. 1993).
“§§ 551 — 559 and the Hells Canyon *1042 National Recreation Area Act (“HCNRA Act”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 460gg to -13, to obtain declaratory and injunctive relief requiring defendant the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) to promulgate rules governing uses of the Hells…”
Oregon Nat. Resources Council v. Lyng, 882 F.2d 1417 (9th Cir. 1989).
“The specified purpose of the HCNRA Act is “[t]o assure that the natural beauty, and historical and archeological values” of this area “are preserved for this and future generations, and that the recreational and ecologic values and public enjoyment of the area are thereby…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 460gg(b) — 5 cases
Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. United States Forest Serv., 593 F.3d 923 (9th Cir. 2010).
“iffs-Appellants Hells Canyon Preservation Council and The Wilderness Society (collectively, "HCPC" or "plaintiffs") brought suit against the United States Forest Service ("Forest Service" or "Service"), seeking a judgment declaring: (1) that the Forest Service has failed to…”
Potlatch Corp. v. United States, 12 P.3d 1260 (Idaho 2000).
“[2] See 16 U.S.C. §§ 460gg (1)-(13). Additionally, the United States claimed reserved water rights in the Boise, Payette, Clearwater, Nez Perce, Sawtooth, and Salmon-Challis National Forests under the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act (MUSYA) (Subcase No.”
Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. United States Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683 (9th Cir. 2005).
“1117 (1975), 16 U.S.C. §§ 460gg et seq. The HCNRA includes the “Hells Canyon Wilderness,” which is defined as the area “depicted on the map entitled ‘Hells Canyon National Recreation Area’ dated May 1978, 1 which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the…”
— 16 U.S.C. § 460gg(l) — 1 case
Potlatch Corp. v. United States, 12 P.3d 1260 (Idaho 2000).
“[2] See 16 U.S.C. §§ 460gg (1)-(13). Additionally, the United States claimed reserved water rights in the Boise, Payette, Clearwater, Nez Perce, Sawtooth, and Salmon-Challis National Forests under the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act (MUSYA) (Subcase No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.