16 U.S.C. § 471
Repealed. Pub. L. 94–579, title VII, § 704(a), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2792
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 61
cases, 1931–2012 · leading case: United States v. Gabrion, 517 F.3d 839 (6th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Gabrion, 517 F.3d 839 (6th Cir. 2008). “The federal government either the President, pursuant to the Creative Act of 1891, 16 U.S.C. § 471 , 26 Stat. 1103 , § 24 (Mar.”
Minard Run Oil Co. v. United States Forest Serv., 670 F.3d 236 (3rd Cir. 2011). “1095 , 1103, codified at 16 U.S.C. § 471 (repealed) (the 1891 Act).”
United States v. New Mexico, 438 U.S. 696 (1978). “1103 , as amended, 16 U. S. C. § 471 (replaced 1976). *706 The Creative Act of 1891 unfortunately did not solve the forest problems of the expanding Nation.”
United States v. Georgia-Pac. Co., 421 F.2d 92 (9th Cir. 1970). “34 , 36, 16 U.S.C.A. § 471 (1897) 25 Thus the 1907-1912 Acts limited Presidential power to extend and create national forests in western states but did not purport to affect his power to reduce such boundaries as conferred under the 1897 Act.”
Bydlon v. United States, 175 F. Supp. 891 (Ct. Cl. 1959). “1095 , 1103; 16 U.S.C.A. § 471 . Thereafter, the reservation was extended by additional proclamations.”
City & Cnty. of Denver, Etc. v. Bergland, 517 F. Supp. 155 (D. Colo. 1981). “1103 , 16 U.S.C. § 471 , which provided, in pertinent part: Sec.”
Avondale Irrigation Dist. v. North Idaho Props., Inc., 577 P.2d 9 (Idaho 1978). “1095 , 1103 (1891) (codified at 16 U.S.C. § 471 ). That statute does not state the purpose for which the President may reserve public lands as national forests, just the requirement that the public land reserved be covered with timber or undergrowth.”
Walker v. United States, 79 Fed. Cl. 685 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “2d at 617 (discussing the establishment of the Gila National Forest, and the Government’s rights thereto under the Creative Act of 1891, 16 U.S.C. § 471 , and the Organic Act of 1897, 16 U.”
United States, & State of Idaho, Dep't of Lands, Intervenor v. E. B. Weiss, James Click, Sr., Orral W. Lake, H. G. King & Orson Baier, 642 F.2d 296 (9th Cir. 1981). “Nor shall anything herein prohibit any person from entering upon such national forests for all proper and lawful purposes, including that of prospecting, locating, and developing the mineral resources thereof.”
Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs of Marshall Co. v. Snellgrove, 428 P.2d 272 (Okla. 1967). “Section 24 of this Act, now codified as the first paragraph of 16 U.S.C.A. § 471 , authorized the creation of "forest reservations" by the President by public proclamation.”
United States v. Jesse, 744 P.2d 491 (Colo. 1987). “” 16 U.S.C. § 471 (repealed 1976). Although the purpose of the Creative Act was not made explicit, the legislative history of the 1891 Act makes clear that its purpose was to preserve natural forest cover in an effort to maintain uniform water flows in streams.”
Joseph C. Saulque v. United States of Am. & Cecil Andrus, Sec'y of the Interior, 663 F.2d 968 (9th Cir. 1981). “§§ 141-143 , 16 U.S.C. § 471 ; 43 C.F.R. 2300.0, et seq.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.