16 U.S.C. § 5951
Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, § 7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 2000–2019 · leading case: River Runners for Wilderness v. Martin, 593 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir. 2010).
River Runners for Wilderness v. Martin, 593 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir. 2010). “16 U.S.C. § 5951 (b). Plaintiffs claim that the 2006 Management Plan is arbitrary and capricious because the Park Service never determined that the types and levels of motorized uses authorized by the Management Plan are necessary and appropriate for public use and consistent…”
River Runners for Wilderness v. Martin, 574 F.3d 723 (9th Cir. 2009). “16 U.S.C. § 5951 (b). Plaintiffs claim that the 2006 CRMP is arbitrary and capricious because the Park Service never determined that the types and levels of motorized uses authorized by the CRMP are necessary and appropriate for public use and consistent with the Park’s…”
Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 282 F.3d 818 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “16 U.S.C. § 5951 . That the government receives monetary compensation or incidental benefits from the conces-sioners’ performance is not enough to sweep these contracts into the ambit of the Contract Disputes Act.”
Mahon v. United States, 742 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2014). “” 16 U.S.C. § 5951 . 2 . That section reads: Concession contracts require each conces-sioner to develop a risk management program that is (1) appropriate in scope to the size and nature of the operation, (2) in accord with [OSHA] and the [Service] concession risk management…”
City of Sausalito v. O'Neill, 386 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir. 2004). “§§ 1371 -1421h; the National Park Service Concessions Management Improvement Act, 16 U.S.C. § 5951 , et seq.; the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996, 16 U.”
Mashack v. Jewell, 149 F. Supp. 3d 11 (D.D.C. 2016). “Concessions Act was originally codified at 16 U.S.C. § 5951 et seq., but that enactment was repealed, and the Act is now codified at 54 U.”
Ft Sumter Tours Inc v. Babbitt, Bruce D., 202 F.3d 349 (D.C. Cir. 2000). “In 1998, the Concessions Policy Act was replaced by the National Park Service Concessions Management Improvement Act, 16 U.S.C. § 5951 et seq. The new legislation does not affect the issues in this case.”
Constitutional Guided Walking Tours, LLC v. Indep. Visitor Ctr. Corp., 804 F. Supp. 2d 320 (E.D. Pa. 2011). “9 With further regard to NPS management provisions, the parties also look to various sections contained within Chapter 79 of Title 16 (National Park Service Organic Act), 10 including the National Park Service Concessions Management and Improvement Act ( 16 U.S.C.S. § 5951 et…”
Mahon v. United States, 795 F. Supp. 2d 149 (D. Mass. 2011). “Contractual Form Next, the United States argues that the Agreement cannot be a concession contract because it is not in the form of a concession contract: it is titled “Memorandum of Agreement” rather than “Concession Contract;” it is only two-and-one-half pages long; it does…”
Constitutional Guided Walking Tours v. Indep. Visitor Ctr. Corp., 454 F. App'x 118 (3rd Cir. 2011). “, arguing that because the Visitor Center Corporation’s SUPs were not the type of agreement contemplated in the Authorization Act, the delegation of management duties to the Visitor Center Corporation violated the Authorization Act, the National Park Service Organic Act (the…”
River Runners v. Alston (9th Cir. 2009). “16 U.S.C. § 5951 (b). Plaintiffs claim that the 2006 CRMP is arbitrary and capri- cious because the Park Service never determined that the types and levels of motorized uses authorized by the CRMP are necessary and appropriate for public use and consistent with the Park’s…”
Heart 6 Ranch, LLC v. Bernhardt, 365 F. Supp. 3d 105 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “16 U.S.C. § 5951 et seq. (1988 Act); 36 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.