16 U.S.C. § 804
Project works affecting navigable waters; requirements insertable in license
Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 501. Section 205(a) of act
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1939–1977 · leading case: United States v. Appalachian Elec. Power Co., 107 F.2d 769 (4th Cir. 1939).
United States v. Appalachian Elec. Power Co., 107 F.2d 769 (4th Cir. 1939). “[10C] Section 11, 16 U.S.C.A. § 804 , provides for the inclusion of conditions to promote navigation where the dam is constructed "in any of the navigable waters of the United States.”
Alabama Power Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 128 F.2d 280 (D.C. Cir. 1942). “1070 , 1071, 1072, 1073, 1074, 1076, §§ 11, 12, 14, 20, 26, 16 U.S.C.A. §§ 804 , 805, 807, 813, 820. Section 26 of the 1920 Act provides for the institution, by the Attorney General, of proceedings in equity for the purpose of revoking any license issued under the Act because of…”
Portland Gen. Elec. Co. & Publishers' Paper Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, Crown Zellerbach Corp. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 328 F.2d 165 (9th Cir. 1964). “1070 , 16 U.S.C. § 804 (1958). 6 On August 18, 1960, the Commission entered an order granting a rehearing confined to conditions relating to navigation facilities.”
United States v. Dist. of Columbia, Dist. of Columbia v. Landmark Servs., Inc., 571 F.2d 651 (D.C. Cir. 1977). “The genesis of Section 804 was a request by the Secretary of the Interior, in 1967, that Congress include in a then pending bill involving the National Visitor Center the following provision: “The Secretary is directed to utilize the authority under the Act of August 25, 1916 (…”
State Water Control Bd. v. Hoffman, 427 F. Supp. 585 (W.D. Va. 1977). “§ 811 ; see also, 16 U.S.C. §§ 804 , 807. A review of § 154 and its legislative history convinces the court that it should not be construed to limit the jurisdiction of the Corps over construction of piers and wharves in Smith Mountain Lake.”
State of California v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 345 F.2d 917 (9th Cir. 1965). “1070 (1920), 16 U.S.C. § 804 (1958). In our opinion the same principle governs where conditions in a license are imposed pursuant to section 10(a).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.