Any person, electric utility, State, municipality, or State commission complaining of anything done or omitted to be done by any licensee, transmitting utility, or public utility in contravention of the provisions of this chapter may apply to the Commission by petition which shall briefly state the facts, whereupon a statement of the complaint thus made shall be forwarded by the Commission to such licensee, transmitting utility, or public utility, who shall be called upon to satisfy the complaint or to answer the same in writing within a reasonable time to be specified by the Commission. If such licensee, transmitting utility, or public utility shall not satisfy the complaint within the time specified or there shall appear to be any reasonable ground for investigating such complaint, it shall be the duty of the Commission to investigate the matters complained of in such manner and by such means as it shall find proper.
Notes of Decisions
Montana-Dakota Utils. Co. v. Nw. Pub. Serv. Co., 341 U.S. 246 (1951).
· cites it 2× “856 , 16 U. S. C. § 825e. That procedure is not available when the wrong asserted is that the defendant corporation has established unlawful schedules by fraudulent domination of the utility with which it transacts business.”
Pub. Citizen, Inc. v. FERC, 7 F.4th 1177 (D.C. Cir. 2021).
· cites it 2× “See 16 U.S.C. § 825e (“[I]t shall be the duty of the Commission to investigate the matters complained of in such manner and by such means as it shall find proper.”
Gulf States Utils. Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 411 U.S. 747 (1973).
· cites it 2× “Additionally, the Commission may investigate unlawful conduct upon a complaint by "[a]ny person, State, municipality, or State commission," § 306 of the Act, 16 U. S. C. § 825e, or on its own motion, § 307 of the Act, 16 U.”
DiLaura v. Power Auth. of State of New York, 786 F. Supp. 241 (W.D.N.Y. 1991).
· cites it 2× “16 U.S.C. § 825e. FERC has the power to conduct investigations, hold hearings and *253 make rulings to require compliance by the licensee with the conditions of its license and FERC regulations.”
Am. Sports Council v. United States Dep't of Educ., 850 F. Supp. 2d 288 (D.D.C. 2012).
“) In Hydro, a developer of hydroelectric power projects petitioned FERC as an “interested partly]” under the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 825e, alleging that a licensing arrangement between two other corporations violated distinct provisions of the Federal Power Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.