U.S. Code » Title 16 » Chapter CHAPTER 12— FEDERAL REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF POWER › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER III— LICENSEES AND PUBLIC UTILITIES; PROCEDURAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

16 U.S.C. § 825g

Hearings; rules of procedure

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Hearings under this chapter may be held before the Commission, any member or members thereof or any representative of the Commission designated by it, and appropriate records thereof shall be kept. In any proceeding before it, the Commission, in accordance with such rules and regulations as it may prescribe, may admit as a party any interested State, State commission, municipality, or any representative of interested consumers or security holders, or any competitor of a party to such proceeding, or any other person whose participation in the proceeding may be in the public interest.(b) All hearings, investigations, and proceedings under this chapter shall be governed by rules of practice and procedure to be adopted by the Commission, and in the conduct thereof the technical rules of evidence need not be applied. No informality in any hearing, investigation, or proceeding or in the manner of taking testimony shall invalidate any order, decision, rule, or regulation issued under the authority of this chapter.(June 10, 1920, ch. 285, pt. III, § 308, as added Aug. 26, 1935, ch. 687, title II, § 213, 49 Stat. 858.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1938–2023 · leading case: California Trout v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 572 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
California Trout v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 572 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “16 U.S.C. § 825g(a) (emphasis added). Pursuant to this statutory authority, the Commission has promulgated Rule 214, which governs what persons may intervene and thereby become parties in Commission proceedings.”
Illinois Com. Comm'n v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 576 F.3d 470 (7th Cir. 2009). · cites it 2× “The first, raised by American Electric Power Service Corporation and the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (participation by state commissions in rate proceedings before FERC is authorized by 16 U.S.C. § 825g(a); see also § 825 l (a)), involves the pricing of electricity…”
N. Colorado Water Conservancy Dist. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, Energenics Sys., Inc., Intervenor, 730 F.2d 1509 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “See also 16 U.S.C. § 825g(a) (1982) (giving Commission broad authority to admit as a party in any proceeding before it any interested state or local government entity, competitors, representatives of consumers or security holders, "or any other person whose participation in the…”
Green Island Power Auth. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 577 F.3d 148 (2d Cir. 2011). “§ 825g(a) (“In any proceeding before it, the Commission, in accordance with such rules and regulations as it may prescribe, may admit as a party any interested State, State commission, municipality, or any representative of interested consumers or security holders, or any…”
The Jicarilla Apache Tribe of Indians v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Sec'y of the Interior, 471 F.2d 1275 (9th Cir. 1973). “In Greene County, the Federal Power Commission was required to hold hearings on the application in question, pursuant to an existing agency review process, mandated by § 308 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 825g. Therefore, the question before the Court was not one of…”
Rivers Elec. Co. v. 4.6 Acres of Land Located in Town of Catskill, 731 F. Supp. 83 (N.D.N.Y. 1990). · cites it 2× “Schmidt and the Fallons were permitted to intervene in the licensing proceedings, pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 825g(a). 1 *85 Neither Greene County, nor its county administrator, attempted to intervene in the proceedings, and they did not participate.”
Montana Power Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 185 F.2d 491 (D.C. Cir. 1950). “16 U.S.C.A. § 825g(b). 24 . Consolidated Edison Co.”
Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Cnty. Assessor, 542 P.2d 1182 (N.M. Ct. App. 1975). “In stating that the “technical Rules of Evidence .”
Matter of Protest of Miller, 542 P.2d 1182 (N.M. Ct. App. 1975). “Since there must be some rules to govern admission of evidence in proceedings before the county valuation protests boards, these rules must be found in the body of administrative law that has grown up in the courts. In stating that the "technical Rules of Evidence .”
F.E.R.C. v. Silkman, 359 F. Supp. 3d 66 (D. Me. 2019). “84 16 U.S.C. § 825g(b) (2012). PSMF ¶ 8; DRPSMF ¶ 8.”
Greene Cnty. Plan. Bd. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 559 F.2d 1227 (2d Cir. 1976). · cites it 2× “That federal agencies possess such discretionary authority has been recognized by the Comptroller General since the Greene County I panel decision, and in the case of the FPC would be based on two statutes that were not considered by that panel, § 308 of the Federal Power Act,…”
Util. Users League & Nickolas L. Barnes v. Fed. Power Comm'n, Commonwealth Edison Co., Intervenor, 394 F.2d 16 (7th Cir. 1968). “After the Commission’s order approving the merger was entered, the petitioners (intervenors) filed a petition for rehearing with the Commission.”
Show all 24 citing cases →
— 16 U.S.C. § 825g(a) — 12 cases
California Trout v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 572 F.3d 1003 (9th Cir. 2009). “16 U.S.C. § 825g(a) (emphasis added). Pursuant to this statutory authority, the Commission has promulgated Rule 214, which governs what persons may intervene and thereby become parties in Commission proceedings.”
Illinois Com. Comm'n v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 576 F.3d 470 (7th Cir. 2009). “The first, raised by American Electric Power Service Corporation and the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (participation by state commissions in rate proceedings before FERC is authorized by 16 U.S.C. § 825g(a); see also § 825 l (a)), involves the pricing of electricity…”
N. Colorado Water Conservancy Dist. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, Energenics Sys., Inc., Intervenor, 730 F.2d 1509 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “See also 16 U.S.C. § 825g(a) (1982) (giving Commission broad authority to admit as a party in any proceeding before it any interested state or local government entity, competitors, representatives of consumers or security holders, "or any other person whose participation in the…”
Green Island Power Auth. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 577 F.3d 148 (2d Cir. 2011). “§ 825g(a) (“In any proceeding before it, the Commission, in accordance with such rules and regulations as it may prescribe, may admit as a party any interested State, State commission, municipality, or any representative of interested consumers or security holders, or any…”
Rivers Elec. Co. v. 4.6 Acres of Land Located in Town of Catskill, 731 F. Supp. 83 (N.D.N.Y. 1990). “Schmidt and the Fallons were permitted to intervene in the licensing proceedings, pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 825g(a). 1 *85 Neither Greene County, nor its county administrator, attempted to intervene in the proceedings, and they did not participate.”
— 16 U.S.C. § 825g(b) — 8 cases
Montana Power Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 185 F.2d 491 (D.C. Cir. 1950). “16 U.S.C.A. § 825g(b). 24 . Consolidated Edison Co.”
Ernest W. Hahn, Inc. v. Cnty. Assessor, 542 P.2d 1182 (N.M. Ct. App. 1975). “In stating that the “technical Rules of Evidence .”
Matter of Protest of Miller, 542 P.2d 1182 (N.M. Ct. App. 1975). “Since there must be some rules to govern admission of evidence in proceedings before the county valuation protests boards, these rules must be found in the body of administrative law that has grown up in the courts. In stating that the "technical Rules of Evidence .”
F.E.R.C. v. Silkman, 359 F. Supp. 3d 66 (D. Me. 2019). “84 16 U.S.C. § 825g(b) (2012). PSMF ¶ 8; DRPSMF ¶ 8.”
S. California Edison Co. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 770 F.2d 779 (9th Cir. 1985).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.