17 U.S.C. § 104A

Copyright in restored works

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 17 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Automatic Protection and Term.—(1)Term.—(A) Copyright subsists, in accordance with this section, in restored works, and vests automatically on the date of restoration.(B) Any work in which copyright is restored under this section shall subsist for the remainder of the term of copyright that the work would have otherwise been granted in the United States if the work never entered the public domain in the United States.(2)Exception.—Any work in which the copyright was ever owned or administered by the Alien Property Custodian and in which the restored copyright would be owned by a government or instrumentality thereof, is not a restored work.(b)Ownership of Restored Copyright.—A restored work vests initially in the author or initial rightholder of the work as determined by the law of the source country of the work.(c)Filing of Notice of Intent to Enforce Restored Copyright Against Reliance Parties.—On or after the date of restoration, any person who owns a copyright in a restored work or an exclusive right therein may file with the Copyright Office a notice of intent to enforce that person’s copyright or exclusive right or may serve such a notice directly on a reliance party. Acceptance of a notice by the Copyright Office is effective as to any reliance parties but shall not create a presumption of the validity of any of the facts stated therein. Service on a reliance party is effective as to that reliance party and any other reliance parties with actual knowledge of such service and of the contents of that notice.(d)Remedies for Infringement of Restored Copyrights.—(1)Enforcement of copyright in restored works in the absence of a reliance party.—As against any party who is not a reliance party, the remedies provided in chapter 5 of this title shall be available on or after the date of restoration of a restored copyright with respect to an act of infringement of the restored copyright that is commenced on or after the date of restoration.(2)Enforcement of copyright in restored works as against reliance parties.—As against a reliance party, except to the extent provided in paragraphs (3) and (4), the remedies provided in chapter 5 of this title shall be available, with respect to an act of infringement of a restored copyright, on or after the date of restoration of the restored copyright if the requirements of either of the following subparagraphs are met:(A)(i) The owner of the restored copyright (or such owner’s agent) or the owner of an exclusive right therein (or such owner’s agent) files with the Copyright Office, during the 24-month period beginning on the date of restoration, a notice of intent to enforce the restored copyright; and(ii)(I) the act of infringement commenced after the end of the 12-month period beginning on the date of publication of the notice in the Federal Register;(II) the act of infringement commenced before the end of the 12-month period described in subclause (I) and continued after the end of that 12-month period, in which case remedies shall be available only for infringement occurring after the end of that 12-month period; or(III) copies or phonorecords of a work in which copyright has been restored under this section are made after publication of the notice of intent in the Federal Register.(B)(i) The owner of the restored copyright (or such owner’s agent) or the owner of an exclusive right therein (or such owner’s agent) serves upon a reliance party a notice of intent to enforce a restored copyright; and(ii)(I) the act of infringement commenced after the end of the 12-month period beginning on the date the notice of intent is received;(II) the act of infringement commenced before the end of the 12-month period described in subclause (I) and continued after the end of that 12-month period, in which case remedies shall be available only for the infringement occurring after the end of that 12-month period; or(III) copies or phonorecords of a work in which copyright has been restored under this section are made after receipt of the notice of intent.In the event that notice is provided under both subparagraphs (A) and (B), the 12-month period referred to in such subparagraphs shall run from the earlier of publication or service of notice.(3)Existing derivative works.—(A) In the case of a derivative work that is based upon a restored work and is created—(i) before the date of the enactment of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, if the source country of the restored work is an eligible country on such date, or(ii) before the date on which the source country of the restored work becomes an eligible country, if that country is not an eligible country on such date of enactment,a reliance party may continue to exploit that derivative work for the duration of the restored copyright if the reliance party pays to the owner of the restored copyright reasonable compensation for conduct which would be subject to a remedy for infringement but for the provisions of this paragraph.(B) In the absence of an agreement between the parties, the amount of such compensation shall be determined by an action in United States district court, and shall reflect any harm to the actual or potential market for or value of the restored work from the reliance party’s continued exploitation of the work, as well as compensation for the relative contributions of expression of the author of the restored work and the reliance party to the derivative work.(4)Commencement of infringement for reliance parties.—For purposes of section 412, in the case of reliance parties, infringement shall be deemed to have commenced before registration when acts which would have constituted infringement had the restored work been subject to copyright were commenced before the date of restoration.(e)Notices of Intent To Enforce a Restored Copyright.—(1)Notices of intent filed with the copyright office.—(A)(i) A notice of intent filed with the Copyright Office to enforce a restored copyright shall be signed by the owner of the restored copyright or the owner of an exclusive right therein, who files the notice under subsection (d)(2)(A)(i) (hereafter in this paragraph referred to as the “owner”), or by the owner’s agent, shall identify the title of the restored work, and shall include an English translation of the title and any other alternative titles known to the owner by which the restored work may be identified, and an address and telephone number at which the owner may be contacted. If the notice is signed by an agent, the agency relationship must have been constituted in a writing signed by the owner before the filing of the notice. The Copyright Office may specifically require in regulations other information to be included in the notice, but failure to provide such other information shall not invalidate the notice or be a basis for refusal to list the restored work in the Federal Register.(ii) If a work in which copyright is restored has no formal title, it shall be described in the notice of intent in detail sufficient to identify it.(iii) Minor errors or omissions may be corrected by further notice at any time after the notice of intent is filed. Notices of corrections for such minor errors or omissions shall be accepted after the period established in subsection (d)(2)(A)(i). Notices shall be published in the Federal Register pursuant to subparagraph (B).(B)(i) The Register of Copyrights shall publish in the Federal Register, commencing not later than 4 months after the date of restoration for a particular nation and every 4 months thereafter for a period of 2 years, lists identifying restored works and the ownership thereof if a notice of intent to enforce a restored copyright has been filed.(ii) Not less than 1 list containing all notices of intent to enforce shall be maintained in the Public Information Office of the Copyright Office and shall be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours pursuant to sections 705 and 708.(C) The Register of Copyrights is authorized to fix reasonable fees based on the costs of receipt, processing, recording, and publication of notices of intent to enforce a restored copyright and corrections thereto.(D)(i) Not later than 90 days before the date the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property referred to in section 101(d)(15) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act enters into force with respect to the United States, the Copyright Office shall issue and publish in the Federal Register regulations governing the filing under this subsection of notices of intent to enforce a restored copyright.(ii) Such regulations shall permit owners of restored copyrights to file simultaneously for registration of the restored copyright.(2)Notices of intent served on a reliance party.—(A) Notices of intent to enforce a restored copyright may be served on a reliance party at any time after the date of restoration of the restored copyright.(B) Notices of intent to enforce a restored copyright served on a reliance party shall be signed by the owner or the owner’s agent, shall identify the restored work and the work in which the restored work is used, if any, in detail sufficient to identify them, and shall include an English translation of the title, any other alternative titles known to the owner by which the work may be identified, the use or uses to which the owner objects, and an address and telephone number at which the reliance party may contact the owner. If the notice is signed by an agent, the agency relationship must have been constituted in writing and signed by the owner before service of the notice.(3)Effect of material false statements.—Any material false statement knowingly made with respect to any restored copyright identified in any notice of intent shall make void all claims and assertions made with respect to such restored copyright.(f)Immunity From Warranty and Related Liability.—(1)In general.—Any person who warrants, promises, or guarantees that a work does not violate an exclusive right granted in section 106 shall not be liable for legal, equitable, arbitral, or administrative relief if the warranty, promise, or guarantee is breached by virtue of the restoration of copyright under this section, if such warranty, promise, or guarantee is made before January 1, 1995.(2)Performances.—No person shall be required to perform any act if such performance is made infringing by virtue of the restoration of copyright under the provisions of this section, if the obligation to perform was undertaken before January 1, 1995.(g)Proclamation of Copyright Restoration.—Whenever the President finds that a particular foreign nation extends, to works by authors who are nationals or domiciliaries of the United States, restored copyright protection on substantially the same basis as provided under this section, the President may by proclamation extend restored protection provided under this section to any work—(1) of which one or more of the authors is, on the date of first publication, a national, domiciliary, or sovereign authority of that nation; or(2) which was first published in that nation.The President may revise, suspend, or revoke any such proclamation or impose any conditions or limitations on protection under such a proclamation.(h)Definitions.—For purposes of this section and section 109(a):(1) The term “date of adherence or proclamation” means the earlier of the date on which a foreign nation which, as of the date the WTO Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States, is not a nation adhering to the Berne Convention or a WTO member country, becomes—(A) a nation adhering to the Berne Convention;(B) a WTO member country;(C) a nation adhering to the WIPO Copyright Treaty;(D) a nation adhering to the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty; or(E) subject to a Presidential proclamation under subsection (g).(2) The “date of restoration” of a restored copyright is—(A)January 1, 1996, if the source country of the restored work is a nation adhering to the Berne Convention or a WTO member country on such date, or(B) the date of adherence or proclamation, in the case of any other source country of the restored work.(3) The term “eligible country” means a nation, other than the United States, that—(A) becomes a WTO member country after the date of the enactment of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act;(B) on such date of enactment is, or after such date of enactment becomes, a nation adhering to the Berne Convention;(C) adheres to the WIPO Copyright Treaty;(D) adheres to the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty; or(E) after such date of enactment becomes subject to a proclamation under subsection (g).(4) The term “reliance party” means any person who—(A) with respect to a particular work, engages in acts, before the source country of that work becomes an eligible country, which would have violated section 106 if the restored work had been subject to copyright protection, and who, after the source country becomes an eligible country, continues to engage in such acts;(B) before the source country of a particular work becomes an eligible country, makes or acquires 1 or more copies or phonorecords of that work; or(C) as the result of the sale or other disposition of a derivative work covered under subsection (d)(3), or significant assets of a person described in subparagraph (A) or (B), is a successor, assignee, or licensee of that person.(5) The term “restored copyright” means copyright in a restored work under this section.(6) The term “restored work” means an original work of authorship that—(A) is protected under subsection (a);(B) is not in the public domain in its source country through expiration of term of protection;(C) is in the public domain in the United States due to—(i) noncompliance with formalities imposed at any time by United States copyright law, including failure of renewal, lack of proper notice, or failure to comply with any manufacturing requirements;(ii) lack of subject matter protection in the case of sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972; or(iii) lack of national eligibility;(D) has at least one author or rightholder who was, at the time the work was created, a national or domiciliary of an eligible country, and if published, was first published in an eligible country and not published in the United States during the 30-day period following publication in such eligible country; and(E) if the source country for the work is an eligible country solely by virtue of its adherence to the WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty, is a sound recording.(7) The term “rightholder” means the person—(A) who, with respect to a sound recording, first fixes a sound recording with authorization, or(B) who has acquired rights from the person described in subparagraph (A) by means of any conveyance or by operation of law.(8) The “source country” of a restored work is—(A) a nation other than the United States;(B) in the case of an unpublished work—(i) the eligible country in which the author or rightholder is a national or domiciliary, or, if a restored work has more than 1 author or rightholder, of which the majority of foreign authors or rightholders are nationals or domiciliaries; or(ii) if the majority of authors or rightholders are not foreign, the nation other than the United States which has the most significant contacts with the work; and(C) in the case of a published work—(i) the eligible country in which the work is first published, or(ii) if the restored work is published on the same day in 2 or more eligible countries, the eligible country which has the most significant contacts with the work.(Added Pub. L. 103–182, title III, § 334(a), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2115; amended Pub. L. 103–465, title V, § 514(a), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4976; Pub. L. 104–295, § 20(e)(2), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3529; Pub. L. 105–80, § 2, Nov. 13, 1997, 111 Stat. 1530; Pub. L. 105–304, title I, § 102(c), Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2862.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The date of the enactment of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, referred to in subsecs. (d)(3)(A) and (h)(3), is the date of enactment of Pub. L. 103–465, which was approved Dec. 8, 1994.

Section 101(d)(15) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, referred to in subsec. (e)(1)(D)(i), is classified to section 3511(d)(15) of Title 19, Customs Duties.

Amendments

1998—Subsec. (h)(1)(A) to (E). Pub. L. 105–304, § 102(c)(1), added subpars. (A) to (E) and struck out former subpars. (A) and (B) which read as follows:

“(A) a nation adhering to the Berne Convention or a WTO member country; or

“(B) subject to a Presidential proclamation under subsection (g).”

Subsec. (h)(3). Pub. L. 105–304, § 102(c)(2), amended par. (3) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (3) read as follows: “The term ‘eligible country’ means a nation, other than the United States, that—

“(A) becomes a WTO member country after the date of the enactment of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act;

“(B) on such date of enactment is, or after such date of enactment becomes, a member of the Berne Convention; or

“(C) after such date of enactment becomes subject to a proclamation under subsection (g).

For purposes of this section, a nation that is a member of the Berne Convention on the date of the enactment of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act shall be construed to become an eligible country on such date of enactment.”

Subsec. (h)(6)(E). Pub. L. 105–304, § 102(c)(3), added subpar. (E).

Subsec. (h)(8)(B)(i). Pub. L. 105–304, § 102(c)(4), inserted “of which” before “the majority” and struck out “of eligible countries” after “domiciliaries”.

Subsec. (h)(9). Pub. L. 105–304, § 102(c)(5), struck out par. (9) which read as follows: “The terms ‘WTO Agreement’ and ‘WTO member country’ have the meanings given those terms in paragraphs (9) and (10), respectively, of section 2 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.”

1997—Subsec. (d)(3)(A). Pub. L. 105–80, § 2(1), amended subpar. (A) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (A) read as follows: “In the case of a derivative work that is based upon a restored work and is created—

“(i) before the date of the enactment of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, if the source country of the derivative work is an eligible country on such date, or

“(ii) before the date of adherence or proclamation, if the source country of the derivative work is not an eligible country on such date of enactment,

a reliance party may continue to exploit that work for the duration of the restored copyright if the reliance party pays to the owner of the restored copyright reasonable compensation for conduct which would be subject to a remedy for infringement but for the provisions of this paragraph.”

Subsec. (e)(1)(B)(ii). Pub. L. 105–80, § 2(2), struck out at end “Such list shall also be published in the Federal Register on an annual basis for the first 2 years after the applicable date of restoration.”

Subsec. (h)(2), (3). Pub. L. 105–80, § 2(3), (4), amended pars. (2) and (3) generally. Prior to amendment, pars. (2) and (3) read as follows:

“(2) The ‘date of restoration’ of a restored copyright is the later of—

“(A) the date on which the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property referred to in section 101(d)(15) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act enters into force with respect to the United States, if the source country of the restored work is a nation adhering to the Berne Convention or a WTO member country on such date; or

“(B) the date of adherence or proclamation, in the case of any other source country of the restored work.

“(3) The term ‘eligible country’ means a nation, other than the United States, that is a WTO member country, adheres to the Berne Convention, or is subject to a proclamation under subsection (g).”

1996—Subsec. (h)(3). Pub. L. 104–295 substituted “subsection (g)” for “section 104A(g)”.

1994—Pub. L. 103–465 substituted “Copyright in restored works” for “Copyright in certain motion pictures” as section catchline and amended text generally, substituting present provisions for provisions restoring copyright in certain motion pictures and providing for effective date of protection as well as use of previously owned copies.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1998 Amendment

Subsec. (h)(1)(A), (B), (E), (3)(A), (B), (E) of this section and amendment by section 102(c)(4), (5) of Pub. L. 105–304 effective Oct. 28, 1998, except as otherwise provided, subsec. (h)(1)(C), (3)(C) of this section effective Mar. 6, 2002, and subsec. (h)(1)(D), (3)(D) of this section and amendment by section 102(c)(3) of Pub. L. 105–304 effective May 20, 2002, see section 105(a), (b)(1)(C), (D), (2)(D)–(F) of Pub. L. 105–304, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Effective Date

Section effective on the date the North American Free Trade Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States (Jan. 1, 1994), see section 335(a) of Pub. L. 103–182, formerly set out in an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 1052 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

Executive DocumentsUruguay Round Agreements: Entry Into Force

The Uruguay Round Agreements, including the World Trade Organization Agreement and agreements annexed to that Agreement, as referred to in section 3511(d) of Title 19, Customs Duties, entered into force with respect to the United States on Jan. 1, 1995. See note set out under section 3511 of Title 19.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 36 cases, 1995–2014 · leading case: Golan v. Holder, 132 S. Ct. 873 (2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Golan v. Holder, 132 S. Ct. 873 (2012). · cites it 18× “One year later, Con- gress replaced this provision with the version of 17 U. S. C. §104A at issue here. See 3 M.”

Dam Things From Denmark, A/K/A Troll Co. Aps v. Russ Berrie & Co., Inc., 290 F.3d 548 (3rd Cir. 2002). · cites it 11× “Dam Things, a Danish company, asserts that its copyright in its original troll design, the “Basic Good Luck Troll,” has been restored pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 104A. Section 104A is a highly unusual provision which has restored copyright protection in a vast number of foreign…”

Troll Co. v. Uneeda Doll Co., Docket No. 05-6487-Cv, 483 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2007). · cites it 8× “This appeal, concerning so-called “restored” copyrights, requires the Court to construe for the first time section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, which was enacted in its present form as part of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA”), Pub.”

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). · cites it 12× “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

Golan v. Holder, 609 F.3d 1076 (10th Cir. 2010). · cites it 6× “4809 , 4976-81 (1994) (codified as amended at 17 U.S.C. §§ 104A, 109), which granted copyright protection to various foreign works that were previously in the public domain in the United States.”

Fed. Treasury Enter. Sojuzplodoimport v. Spirits Int'l N.V., 425 F. Supp. 2d 458 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). · cites it 7× “See 17 U.S.C. § 104A. To qualify as a “restored work” the copyright must (1) be an original work of authorship; (2) not be in the public domain in-its source country; (3) be in the public domain in the United States due to noncompliance with formalities imposed at any time by…”

Golan v. Ashcroft, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (D. Colo. 2004). · cites it 3× “103M65 (amending 17 U.S.C. §§ 104A, 109(a)), unconstitutionally remove from, or staunch the flow of, literary and artistic works into the public domain.”

Peliculas Y Videos Internacionales, Sa De Cv v. Harriscope of Los Angeles, Inc., 302 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (C.D. Cal. 2004). · cites it 8× “17 U.S.C. § 104A (a)(1)(A) & (h)(2). The copyright to these works “vests initially in the author or initial rightholder of the work as determined by the law of the source country of the work.”

Capitol Records, Inc. v. Naxos of Am., Inc., 830 N.E.2d 250 (NY 2005). · cites it 2× “Nor does the statutory implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub L 103-465, 108 US Stat 4809 [1994]), which appears in 17 USC § 104A, alter the common law with respect to the recordings at issue.”

Capitol Records, Inc. v. Naxos of Am., Inc., 372 F.3d 471 (2d Cir. 2004). · cites it 2× “4809 (1994), 12 particularly the provision of that Act that amends the 1976 Copyrights Act, see 17 U.S.C. § 104A. Section 104A restores copyright protection for certain works of foreign origin that lack copyright protection in the United States, including sound recordings fixed…”

Dam Things From Denmark v. Russ Berrie & Co., 173 F. Supp. 2d 277 (D.N.J. 2001). · cites it 5× “In 1996, pursuant to the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Congress enacted 17 U.S.C. § 104A, which provides that owners of copyrights which were lost to the United States public domain because of a failure to comply with a formality in U.”

Golan v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007). · cites it 2× “4809, 4976-80 (1994), codified at 17 U.S.C. §§ 104A, 1 109. Also known as the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, the CTEA in *1182 creased the duration of existing and future copyrights from life-plus-50-years to life-plus — 70—years.”

Show all 36 citing cases →

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(2)(b) — 1 case

Alameda Films S a De C v v. Authors Rights Restoration Corp., 331 F.3d 472 (5th Cir. 2003).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(a) — 2 cases

Golan v. Holder, 609 F.3d 1076 (10th Cir. 2010). “4809 , 4976-81 (1994) (codified as amended at 17 U.S.C. §§ 104A, 109), which granted copyright protection to various foreign works that were previously in the public domain in the United States.”

Golan v. Holder (10th Cir. 2010).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(a)(1)(A) — 3 cases

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

Alameda Films S a De C v v. Authors Rights Restoration Corp., 331 F.3d 472 (5th Cir. 2003).

Broadcast Music Inc v. Roger Miller Music (6th Cir. 2005).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(a)(1)(B) — 1 case

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(a)(l) — 1 case

Troll Co. v. Uneeda Doll Co., Ltd., 400 F. Supp. 2d 601 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(a)(l)(A) — 1 case

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Roger Miller Music, Inc., Shannon Miller Turner, 396 F.3d 762 (6th Cir. 2005).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(a)(l)(B) — 2 cases

Dam Things From Denmark, A/K/A Troll Co. Aps v. Russ Berrie & Co., Inc., 290 F.3d 548 (3rd Cir. 2002). “Dam Things, a Danish company, asserts that its copyright in its original troll design, the “Basic Good Luck Troll,” has been restored pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 104A. Section 104A is a highly unusual provision which has restored copyright protection in a vast number of foreign…”

Golan v. Ashcroft, 310 F. Supp. 2d 1215 (D. Colo. 2004). “103M65 (amending 17 U.S.C. §§ 104A, 109(a)), unconstitutionally remove from, or staunch the flow of, literary and artistic works into the public domain.”

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(b) — 8 cases

Troll Co. v. Uneeda Doll Co., Docket No. 05-6487-Cv, 483 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2007). “This appeal, concerning so-called “restored” copyrights, requires the Court to construe for the first time section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, which was enacted in its present form as part of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA”), Pub.”

Alameda Films S a De C v v. Authors Rights Restoration Corp., 331 F.3d 472 (5th Cir. 2003).

Peliculas Y Videos Internacionales, Sa De Cv v. Harriscope of Los Angeles, Inc., 302 F. Supp. 2d 1131 (C.D. Cal. 2004). “17 U.S.C. § 104A (a)(1)(A) & (h)(2). The copyright to these works “vests initially in the author or initial rightholder of the work as determined by the law of the source country of the work.”

Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc., 153 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 1998).

Peter Mayer Publishers Inc. v. Shilovskaya, 11 F. Supp. 3d 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(c) — 4 cases

Golan v. Holder, 132 S. Ct. 873 (2012). “One year later, Con- gress replaced this provision with the version of 17 U. S. C. §104A at issue here. See 3 M.”

Peter Mayer Publishers Inc. v. Shilovskaya, 11 F. Supp. 3d 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).

Golan v. Holder (2012).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(d) — 3 cases

Golan v. Holder, 611 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (D. Colo. 2009).

Troll Co. v. Uneeda Doll Co., Ltd., 400 F. Supp. 2d 601 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(d)(1) — 1 case

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(d)(2) — 6 cases

Golan v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2007). “4809, 4976-80 (1994), codified at 17 U.S.C. §§ 104A, 1 109. Also known as the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, the CTEA in *1182 creased the duration of existing and future copyrights from life-plus-50-years to life-plus — 70—years.”

Fed. Treasury Enter. Sojuzplodoimport v. Spirits Int'l N.V., 425 F. Supp. 2d 458 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). “See 17 U.S.C. § 104A. To qualify as a “restored work” the copyright must (1) be an original work of authorship; (2) not be in the public domain in-its source country; (3) be in the public domain in the United States due to noncompliance with formalities imposed at any time by…”

Luck Music Library v. Gonzales, Alberto, 407 F.3d 1262 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(d)(2)(A) — 2 cases

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(d)(2)(A)(ii) — 1 case

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(d)(3) — 3 cases

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

Peter Mayer Publishers Inc. v. Shilovskaya, 11 F. Supp. 3d 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(d)(3)(A) — 3 cases

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

Golan v. Holder (10th Cir. 2010).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(d)(4) — 1 case

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(d)(l) — 1 case

Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. Landau Jewelry, 583 F. Supp. 2d 461 (S.D.N.Y. 2008).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(e)(1) — 1 case

Troll Co. v. Uneeda Doll Co. (2d Cir. 2007).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(e)(l) — 1 case

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h) — 2 cases

Van Cleef & Arpels Logistics, S.A. v. Landau Jewelry, 583 F. Supp. 2d 461 (S.D.N.Y. 2008).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(2) — 1 case

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(2)(A) — 4 cases

Golan v. Holder, 132 S. Ct. 873 (2012). “One year later, Con- gress replaced this provision with the version of 17 U. S. C. §104A at issue here. See 3 M.”

Golan v. Holder (2012).

Int'l Media Films, Inc. v. Lucas Ent., Inc., 703 F. Supp. 2d 456 (S.D.N.Y. 2010).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(3) — 5 cases

Golan v. Holder, 132 S. Ct. 873 (2012). “One year later, Con- gress replaced this provision with the version of 17 U. S. C. §104A at issue here. See 3 M.”

Dam Things From Denmark v. Russ Berrie & Co., 173 F. Supp. 2d 277 (D.N.J. 2001). “In 1996, pursuant to the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Congress enacted 17 U.S.C. § 104A, which provides that owners of copyrights which were lost to the United States public domain because of a failure to comply with a formality in U.”

Golan v. Holder (2012).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(4) — 7 cases

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(4)(A) — 3 cases

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

Peter Mayer Publishers Inc. v. Shilovskaya, 11 F. Supp. 3d 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(6) — 7 cases

Hoepker v. Kruger, 200 F. Supp. 2d 340 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). “Section 104A of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 104A, effectuates the restoration.”

Luck Music Library v. Gonzales, Alberto, 407 F.3d 1262 (D.C. Cir. 2005).

Luck's Music Library, Inc. v. Ashcroft, 321 F. Supp. 2d 107 (D.D.C. 2004).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(6)(A) — 2 cases

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(6)(B) — 4 cases

Golan v. Holder, 132 S. Ct. 873 (2012). “One year later, Con- gress replaced this provision with the version of 17 U. S. C. §104A at issue here. See 3 M.”

Peter Mayer Publishers Inc. v. Shilovskaya, 11 F. Supp. 3d 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).

Golan v. Holder (2012).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(6)(C)(I) — 1 case

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(6)(C)(i) — 3 cases

Luck's Music Library, Inc. v. Ashcroft, 321 F. Supp. 2d 107 (D.D.C. 2004).

Peter Mayer Publishers Inc. v. Shilovskaya, 11 F. Supp. 3d 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(6)(C)(ii) — 2 cases

Capitol Records, Inc. v. Naxos of Am., Inc., 372 F.3d 471 (2d Cir. 2004). “4809 (1994), 12 particularly the provision of that Act that amends the 1976 Copyrights Act, see 17 U.S.C. § 104A. Section 104A restores copyright protection for certain works of foreign origin that lack copyright protection in the United States, including sound recordings fixed…”

Capitol Records, Inc. v. Naxos of Am., Inc., 262 F. Supp. 2d 204 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(6)(D) — 3 cases

Golan v. Holder, 132 S. Ct. 873 (2012). “One year later, Con- gress replaced this provision with the version of 17 U. S. C. §104A at issue here. See 3 M.”

Golan v. Holder (2012).

— 17 U.S.C. § 104A(h)(7) — 1 case

Alameda Films S a De C v v. Authors Rights Restoration Corp., 331 F.3d 472 (5th Cir. 2003).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.