U.S. Code » Title 18 » Part PART I— CRIMES › Chapter CHAPTER 47— FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS

18 U.S.C. § 1011

Federal land bank mortgage transactions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever, being a mortgagee, knowingly makes any false statement in any paper, proposal, or letter, relating to the sale of any mortgage, to any Federal land bank; or

Whoever, being an appraiser, willfully over-values any land securing such mortgage—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1980–2023 · leading case: United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997). · cites it 2× “§ 924 (penalizing knowing false statement in information gun dealers must provide); 18 U. S. C. § 1011 (penalizing knowing false statement in sale of mortgage to federal land bank); 18 U.”
United States v. Alvarez, 617 F.3d 1198 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 2× “The following are just some of the statutes that punish false statements and do not appear to require proof of harm (including that the false statement be "material"): 18 U.S.C. § 1011 (punishing "any false statement .”
United States v. Michael E. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 1994). “§ 924 (penalizing knowing false statement in information gun dealers must provide); 18 U.S.C. § 1011 (penalizing knowing false statement in sale of mortgage to federal land bank); 18 U.”
United States v. Pavlick, 507 F. Supp. 359 (M.D. Penn. 1980). “§ 1010 (outlaws fraud in loans that concern the Department of Housing and Urban Development); 18 U.S.C. § 1011 (criminalizes dishonesty in federal land bank mortgages); 18 U.”
Paul Jackson v. Wells Fargo Bank, Nat'l Ass'n (11th Cir. 2023). · cites it 2× “§ 1692 , and 18 U.S.C. § 1011 in connection with a state foreclosure action.”
United States v. Victor Lebron (4th Cir. 2021). “§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(E); and making a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1011 (a)(2). Lebron challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions and the reasonableness of his sentence.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.