18 U.S.C. § 1262

Transportation into State prohibiting sale

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever imports, brings, or transports any intoxicating liquor into any State, Territory, District, or Possession in which all sales, except for scientific, sacramental, medicinal, or mechanical purposes, of intoxicating liquor containing more than 4 per centum of alcohol by volume or 3.2 per centum of alcohol by weight are prohibited, otherwise than in the course of continuous interstate transportation through such State, Territory, District, or Possession or attempts so to do, or assists in so doing,

Shall (1) If such liquor is not accompanied by such permits, or licenses therefor as may be required by the laws of such State, Territory, District, or Possession or (2) if all importation, bringing, or transportation of intoxicating liquor into such State, Territory, District, or Possession is prohibited by the laws thereof, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

In the enforcement of this section, the definition of intoxicating liquor contained in the laws of the respective States, Territories, Districts, or Possessions shall be applied, but only to the extent that sales of such intoxicating liquor (except for scientific, sacramental, medicinal, and mechanical purposes) are prohibited therein.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 23 cases, 1950–1997 · leading case: Manfred Daut v. United States, 405 F.2d 312 (9th Cir. 1969).
Manfred Daut v. United States, 405 F.2d 312 (9th Cir. 1969). “492 (1903); see also, 18 U.S.C. § 1262 (Liquor transport) ; 18 U.”
Earl Elmer Gravatt v. United States, 260 F.2d 498 (10th Cir. 1958). “Count 1 charged him with violating 18 U.S.C. § 1262 , unlawfully transporting liquor into legally dry Oklahoma, and Count 2 charged a violation of 15 U.”
Russell G. Cofer v. United States, 256 F.2d 221 (8th Cir. 1958). · cites it 2× “Cofer has appealed from a judgment and sentence based upon the verdict of a jury finding him guilty under the first count of an information which charged him with having, on September 24,1955, in Newton County, Missouri, attempted to transport intoxicating liquor into the State…”
City of Tulsa v. Bd. of Trs. of Police Pension, 387 P.2d 255 (Okla. 1963). “( 18 U.S.C.A. § 1262 ). These and other facts concerning the end of Mr.”
Florida Dep't of Bus. Reg. v. Zachy's Wine & Liquor, Inc., 125 F.3d 1399 (11th Cir. 1997). “§ 3 (1936), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1262 . Section 9 of the new act repealed the Reed Amendment.”
United States v. John M. Winters, Jr., & Marian M. Winters, 261 F.2d 675 (10th Cir. 1958). “22 The accomplishment of this illegal purpose required the importation of the whiskey into Oklahoma 23 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1262 which makes a federal penal offense of the importation of intoxicating liquor into a state which forbids the sale thereof, 24 and also in…”
United States v. Elmer Samuel Chapman, United States of Am. v. James Terrell Knight, 413 F.2d 440 (5th Cir. 1969). “1879 (1949), a case involving a conviction for a misdemeanor under the Liquor Enforcement Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1262 , the Supreme Court, in discussing the standards for determining probable cause for arrest, as well as for search and seizure, said: “In dealing with probable cause,…”
Harry Patrick McCarthy v. United States, 264 F.2d 473 (8th Cir. 1959). “The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, if the search-and-seizure was valid, is not otherwise challenged.”
Ritter v. United States, 230 F.2d 324 (10th Cir. 1956). · cites it 2× “The alleged objects of the conspiracy were to violate 18 U.S.C.A. § 1262 by importing intoxicating liquor into the State of Oklahoma, 26 U.”
Jones v. United States, 251 F.2d 288 (10th Cir. 1958). “The first count alleges that the appellants, with others, conspired to import intoxicating liquor into the dry state of Oklahoma in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1262 . The second count charged a conspiracy by the defendants to carry on the business of wholesale and retail liquor…”
City Nat. Bank, Lawton, Okl. v. United States, 207 F.2d 741 (10th Cir. 1953). · cites it 2× “The United States instituted this proceeding for the forfeiture of a 1951 *743 Cadillac Sedan and 26 gallons of whiskey for violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1262 . 1 Central Motor Co., Inc.”
Milton Eldo Smith v. United States, 264 F.2d 469 (8th Cir. 1959). “Appellant was convicted, on a jury-waived trial, of having unlawfully attempted to transport intoxicating liquor into the “dry” State of Oklahoma, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1262 . He was given a prison sentence of four months and a fine of $250.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.