18 U.S.C. § 1462

Importation or transportation of obscene matters

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever brings into the United States, or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof, or knowingly uses any express company or other common carrier or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) 11 See References in Text note below. of the Communications Act of 1934), for carriage in interstate or foreign commerce—(a) any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy book, pamphlet, picture, motion-picture film, paper, letter, writing, print, or other matter of indecent character; or(b) any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy phonograph recording, electrical transcription, or other article or thing capable of producing sound; or(c) any drug, medicine, article, or thing designed, adapted, or intended for producing abortion, or for any indecent or immoral use; or any written or printed card, letter, circular, book, pamphlet, advertisement, or notice of any kind giving information, directly or indirectly, where, how, or of whom, or by what means any of such mentioned articles, matters, or things may be obtained or made; orWhoever knowingly takes or receives, from such express company or other common carrier or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) ¹ of the Communications Act of 1934) any matter or thing the carriage or importation of which is herein made unlawful—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both, for the first such offense and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both, for each such offense thereafter.(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 768; May 27, 1950, ch. 214, § 1, 64 Stat. 194; Pub. L. 85–796, § 2, Aug. 28, 1958, 72 Stat. 962; Pub. L. 91–662, § 4, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1973; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), (L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–104, title V, § 507(a), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 137.)Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 396 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, § 245, 35 Stat. 1138; June 5, 1920, ch. 268, 41 Stat. 1060).

Reference to persons causing or procuring was omitted as unnecessary in view of definition of “principal” in section 2 of this title.

Words “in interstate or foreign commerce” were substituted for ten lines of text without loss of meaning. (See definitive section 10 of this title.)

(See reviser’s note under section 1461 of this title.)

Minor changes in phraseology were made.

Editorial NotesReferences in Text

Section 230(e)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934, referred to in text, was redesignated section 230(f)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 by Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title XIV, § 1404(a)(2), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–739, and is classified to section 230(f)(2) of Title 47, Telecommunications.

Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–104, § 507(a)(1), inserted “or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934)” after “carrier” in first par.

Pub. L. 104–104, § 507(a)(2), in second par., inserted “or receives,” after “takes”, “or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934)” after “common carrier”, and “or importation” after “carriage”.

1994—Pub. L. 103–322, in last par., substituted “fined under this title” for “fined not more than $5,000” after “Shall be” and for “fined not more than $10,000” after “and shall be”.

1971—Pub. L. 91–662 struck out “preventing conception, or” before “producing abortion”.

1958—Pub. L. 85–796 substituted “uses” for “deposits with” in opening par., “carriage of which” for “depositing of which for carriage” in penultimate par., and inserted penalty provisions for subsequent offenses in last par.

1950—Act May 27, 1950, brought within scope of section the importation or transportation of any obscene, lewd, lascivious, or filthy phonograph recording, electrical transcription, or other article or think capable of producing sound.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1971 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–662 effective Jan. 9, 1971, see section 7 of Pub. L. 91–662, set out as a note under section 552 of this title.

Construction of 1996 Amendment

Pub. L. 104–104, title V, § 507(c), Feb. 8, 1996, 110 Stat. 137, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [amending this section and section 1465 of this title] are clarifying and shall not be interpreted to limit or repeal any prohibition contained in sections 1462 and 1465 of title 18, United States Code, before such amendment, under the rule established in United States v. Alpers, 338 U.S. 680 (1950).”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 292 cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1950–2025 · leading case: United States v. Whorley, 550 F.3d 326 (4th Cir. 2008).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Whorley, 550 F.3d 326 (4th Cir. 2008). · cites it 24× “*330 OPINION NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: Dwight Whorley was convicted of (1) knowingly receiving on a computer 20 obscene Japanese anime cartoons depicting minors engaging in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462 ; (2) knowingly receiving, as a person…”

United States v. Dodds, 347 F.3d 893 (11th Cir. 2003). · cites it 11× “§ 2252A(a)(5)(B) and knowingly receiving obscene pictures in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462 . Dodds challenges his conviction and sentence on three grounds.”

United States v. New Buffalo Amusement Corp., Aquarius Releasing, Inc., & Terry Levene, 600 F.2d 368 (2d Cir. 1979). · cites it 15× “d on May 2, 1973, against appellants Levene, Aquarius, New Buffalo, and various other defendants not involved in this appeal, 1 Levene and Aquar *372 ius wére convicted of knowingly using a common carrier for carriage in interstate commerce of an obscene film, and New Buffalo…”

United States v. Tome, 611 F.3d 1371 (11th Cir. 2010). · cites it 4× “At his revocation hearing, Tome pled guilty to these multiple supervised release violations: (1) importing or transporting obscene matters, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1462 (a), based on Tome’s sending to an inmate a graphic letter (which was introduced at sentencing and which…”

Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87 (1974). · cites it 6× “§ 1305 (a) and 18 U. S. C. § 1462 , see United States v.”

United States v. Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008). · cites it 2× “(After the time of the congressional hearings, the court dismissed the child pornography charges upon the Government's motion, and the defendant was convicted on multiple counts of transportation of obscene material under 18 U.S.C. § 1462 . See Criminal Docket for Case No.”

Ward v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 767 (1977). · cites it 6× “We have also indicated our approval of an identical approach with respect to the companion provisions of 18 U. S. C. § 1462 , which prohibits importation or transportation of obscene matter.”

United States v. Kilbride, 584 F.3d 1240 (9th Cir. 2009). · cites it 4× “face; 3) the district court committed a clerical error in its written judgment by labeling as felonies Defendants’ convictions for fraud in connection with electronic mail; 4) Defendants’ money laundering conspiracy convictions should be reversed because the required related…”

Smith v. United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977). · cites it 4× “139, 145 (1973) (movement of obscene material in interstate commerce, 18 U. S. C. § 1462 ). In Hamling v. United States, 418 U.”

All. Hippocratic Med. v. FDA, 78 F.4th 210 (5th Cir. 2023). · cites it 4× “” 18 U.S.C. § 1462 . So I would affirm the district court.”

United States v. Orito, 413 U.S. 139 (1973). · cites it 6× “Appellee Orito was charged in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin with a violation of 18 U. S. C. § 1462 [1] in that he did "knowingly transport and carry in interstate commerce from San Francisco .”

United States v. Michael G. Thevis & Peachtree News Co., Inc., 484 F.2d 1149 (5th Cir. 1973). · cites it 9× “were charged in a twelve-count indictment with transporting obscene material by common carrier in interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1462 . 1 Jury trial was *1151 waived.”

Show all 292 citing cases →

— 18 U.S.C. § 1462(a) — 1 case

United States v. Anthony Deramo, 426 F.2d 779 (3rd Cir. 1970).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.