18 U.S.C. § 1594
General provisions
2015—Subsec. (d)(1). Pub. L. 114–22, § 105(a)(1)(A), substituted “that was involved in, used, or” for “that was used or” and inserted “, and any property traceable to such property” after “such violation”.
Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 114–22, § 105(a)(1)(B), inserted “, or any property traceable to such property” after “such violation”.
Subsec. (e)(1)(A). Pub. L. 114–22, § 105(a)(2), substituted “involved in, used, or” for “used or” and inserted “, and any property traceable to such property” after “any violation of this chapter”.
Subsecs. (f), (g). Pub. L. 114–22, § 105(a)(3), (4), added subsec. (f) and redesignated former subsec. (f) as (g).
2008—Subsecs. (b) to (f). Pub. L. 110–457 added subsecs. (b) and (c) and redesignated former subsecs. (b) to (d) as (d) to (f), respectively.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 237
cases (125 in the last 5 years), 2006–2026 · leading case: Paguirigan v. Prompt Nursing Emp't Agency LLC, 286 F. Supp. 3d 430 (E.D.N.Y 2017).
Paguirigan v. Prompt Nursing Emp't Agency LLC, 286 F. Supp. 3d 430 (E.D.N.Y 2017). “§ 1589 (forced labor) 4 ; (2) violation of the TVPA § 1590 (trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor); (3) conspiracy to violate the TVPA, 18 U.S.C. § 1594 (b) ; (4) attempt to violate the TVPA, 18 U.”
United States v. Jamiell Sims, 957 F.3d 362 (3rd Cir. 2020). “This appeal presents a legal question arising under the United States Sentencing Guidelines: What is the base offense level for conspiracy to commit sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1594 (c)? We hold that level 34 applies.”
United States v. James Mozie, 752 F.3d 1271 (11th Cir. 2014). “Procedural History In September 2011 a grand jury returned a third superseding indictment against Mozie, which charged him with one count of conspiring to commit child sex trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1594 (c), eight counts of child sex trafficking in violation of 18…”
United States v. Zhong, 26 F.4th 536 (2d Cir. 2022). “Dan Zhong appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, on five counts: (1) forced-labor conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1594 (b); (2) forced labor, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Wei Lin, 841 F.3d 823 (9th Cir. 2016). “OPINION FARRIS, Senior Circuit Judge: Defendant Wei Lin was charged with conspiracy to commit sex trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1594 (c), and several counts of sex trafficking, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Brinson, 772 F.3d 1314 (10th Cir. 2014). “Brinson guilty of Attempted Sex Trafficking of Children under 18 U.S.C. § 1594 (a). This finding was also supported by the evi: dence.”
United States v. Overton, 24 F.4th 870 (2d Cir. 2022). “On appeal, Overton argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea, which was entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C). Specifically, Overton asserts that because the court had only “provisionally” accepted his…”
United States v. Johnelle Bell, 761 F.3d 900 (8th Cir. 2014). “Bell was charged with one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1594 (c) and 1591(a). Bell was also charged with two counts of sex trafficking, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Mark Carter, II, 960 F.3d 1007 (8th Cir. 2020). “§ 2421 , and conspiracy to engage in sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion, 18 U.S.C. § 1594 (c). The indictment described the conspiracy as one “to cause ‘Victim 4’ to engage in a commercial sex act, in violation of 18 U.”
Stein v. World-Wide Plumbing Supply Inc., 71 F. Supp. 3d 320 (E.D.N.Y 2014). “§ 1593A, attempted violation of prohibitions on peonage, enticement into slavery and forced labor under 18 U.S.C. § 1594 (a), and conspiracy to violate prohibitions on peonage, enticement into slavery and forced labor under 18 U.”
United States v. Terrell Banker, 876 F.3d 530 (4th Cir. 2017). “AGEE, Circuit Judge: Terrell Banker appeals his convictions for conspiracy to engage in sex trafficking of a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1594 ; sex trafficking of a minor,-in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. David Pennington, 78 F.4th 955 (6th Cir. 2023). “While facing charges for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1594 (c), Defendant David Pennington improperly communicated with witnesses in No.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1594(c) — 1 case
Williams v. United States (E.D. Wis. 2022).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.