18 U.S.C. § 1834
Criminal forfeiture
Forfeiture, destruction, and restitution relating to this chapter shall be subject to section 2323, to the extent provided in that section, in addition to any other similar remedies provided by law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1998–2013 · leading case: Castaneda Castillo v. Holder, Jr., 723 F.3d 48 (1st Cir. 2013).
Castaneda Castillo v. Holder, Jr., 723 F.3d 48 (1st Cir. 2013). “Nevertheless, the government argued before the federal district court in Massachusetts that Castañeda should be held in custody without bail until a determination of extraditability was made under 18 U.S.C. § 1834 . Id. at 50 . On August 17, 2010, the district court in Castañeda…”
United States v. Kai-Lo Hsu, A/K/A James Hsu. United States of Am. v. Chester S. Ho. United States of Am., 155 F.3d 189 (3rd Cir. 1998). “Moreover, under both sections, defendants are subject to criminal forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1834 , which states that a person or entity shall forfeit any property constituting, or derived from, the proceeds of an EEA crime, and, if the sentencing court “in its…”
United States v. Tomo Razmilovic, David E. Nachman, Kenneth Jaeggi, Movant-Appellant, 419 F.3d 134 (2d Cir. 2005). “shall apply to all stages of a criminal forfeiture proceeding” for electronic mail fraud); 18 U.S.C. § 1834 (b) (forfeiture mandatory for trade secret offenses, and "[p]roperty subject to forfeiture under this section, any seizure and disposition thereof, and any administrative…”
United States v. Castaneda-Castillo, 739 F. Supp. 2d 49 (D. Mass. 2010). “The United States has requested that Castaneda-Castillo be held without bail until a determination of extraditability is made pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1834 . Castaneda-Castillo has moved for bail, arguing that numerous “special circumstances” exist which override the presumption…”
In re the Extradition of Mujagic, 990 F. Supp. 2d 207 (N.D.N.Y. 2013). “” 18 U.S.C. § 1834 ; In re Extradition of Kapoor, No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.