18 U.S.C. § 210
Offer to procure appointive public office
Whoever pays or offers or promises any money or thing of value, to any person, firm, or corporation in consideration of the use or promise to use any influence to procure any appointive office or place under the United States for any person, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1982–2002 · leading case: United States v. Richard W. Canestraro, 282 F.3d 427 (6th Cir. 2002).
United States v. Richard W. Canestraro, 282 F.3d 427 (6th Cir. 2002). “See 18 U.S.C. § 210 (a)(1) & (c)(1)(B). In November 1998, DeLuea and Vincent Zumpano, a NOVAA employee, attempted to negotiate a contract with the owner of Pine Hollow, whereby the owner would pay them to assist in obtaining permits for Pine Hollow or to assist in the sale of…”
United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers, Union No. 33 v. Edwin Meese, Attorney Gen. of the United States of Am., 823 F.2d 652 (1st Cir. 1987). “, 18 U.S.C. § 210 (1982) (offer to procure appointive public office); 18 U.”
United States v. MacUla Anty, 203 F.3d 305 (4th Cir. 2000). “or because of such testimony 18 U.S.C. § 210 (1958 ed.) (emphasis added).”
United States v. Michael J. Oberhardt, 887 F.2d 790 (7th Cir. 1989). “*792 Oberhardt was subsequently arrested and indicted for bribery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 210 , receiving stolen governmental property in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Myers, 692 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1982). “Early in the colloquy with counsel, Judge Pratt had suggested that it would be “kind of a far-out view” if the jury thought that on October 20, Murphy “really didn’t accept [the money] for his own benefit” and was “giving it up to Howard Criden with no further claims on it.”
United States v. Donald Castle, & Darrell W.T. Lowry, 925 F.2d 831 (5th Cir. 1991). “§ 201 (both payment and receipt of bribe to influence an official act prohibited; passed seven years before FCPA); 18 U.S.C. §§ 210 and 211, 212 and 213, 214 and 215 and 216 (parallel provisions prohibiting payment and receipt of bribes).”
United States v. White, 27 F. Supp. 2d 646 (E.D.N.C. 1998). “This matter is before the court on defendants’ motions to suppress the testimony of certain witnesses on the basis that the government’s plea agreements with these witnesses violate the antigratuity statute, 18 U.S.C. § 210 (c)(2). The court previously summarily denied defendant…”
In Re Glover-Tonwe, 626 A.2d 1387 (D.C. 1993). “§ 371 , and bribery of a public official in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 210 & 201(b)(1)(A). United States v.”
United States v. Blondek, 741 F. Supp. 116 (N.D. Tex. 1990). “§ 201 (both payment and receipt of bribe to influence an official act prohibited; passed seven years before FCPA); 18 U.S.C. §§ 210 and 211, 212 and 213, 214 and 215 and 216 (parallel provisions prohibiting payment and receipt of bribes).”
United States v. Macula Anty (4th Cir. 2000). “18 U.S.C. § 210 (1958 ed.) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.