Notes of Decisions
United States v. Terron Bryant, 949 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 2020).
· cites it 9× “FLOYD, Circuit Judge: In 2010, Terron Lamar Bryant was convicted for assaulting with intent to rob, steal, or purloin a postal employee and placing their life in jeopardy by use of a dangerous weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2114 (a), and for brandishing a firearm during and…”
Michael Knight v. United States, 936 F.3d 495 (6th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 10× “The government maintains, however, that Knight’s conviction under § 924(c) for using a firearm during assault and robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2114 (a) should be affirmed because that offense qualifies under the “elements clause” of the definition of a “crime of violence”…”
United States v. Deandre Enoch, 865 F.3d 575 (7th Cir. 2017).
· cites it 10× “The government charged Deandre Enoch with robbing a person having custody of property belonging to the United States, under 18 U.S.C. § 2114 (a) and brandishing a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, under 18 U.”
Garcia v. United States, 469 U.S. 70 (1985).
· cites it 6× “They were convicted of violating 18 U. S. C. § 2114 , which proscribes the assault and robbery of any custodian of "mail matter or of any money or other property of the United States.”
USA V.tony Buck, 23 F.4th 919 (9th Cir. 2022).
· cites it 8× “§ 2255 in which federal prisoner Tony Buck argued that his convictions for assaulting a mail carrier with intent to steal in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2114 (a) did not qualify as crimes of violence under 18 U.”
United States v. Ricardo Ruiz, 986 F.2d 905 (5th Cir. 1993).
· cites it 9× “Ruiz and Crawford were charged in a three-count indictment that stated: (1) Ruiz and Crawford assaulted a person having charge of money and other property of the United States with the intent to rob, and in so doing put the life of the victim in jeopardy by the use of a…”
United States v. Robert Earl Dowd, 451 F.3d 1244 (11th Cir. 2006).
· cites it 4× “8 Dowd also received a consecutive seven-year sentence for his Count Two conviction for using a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c).”
United States v. Troy Vaval, 404 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 2005).
· cites it 3× “§ 2119 (1) (Count I), robbery of federal money using a dangerous weapon, 18 U.S.C. § 2114 (a) (Count II), and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number, 18 U.”
United States v. Walter B. Spears, 449 F.2d 946 (D.C. Cir. 1971).
· cites it 14× “Thus, both 18 U.S.C. § 2114 and D.C.Code §§ 22-2901, 3202 each are applicable to the crime committed by appellant, 12 and since we vacate the conviction on the assault charge, the fact that it was charged under the federal law, while the robbery was charged under the District…”
United States v. George E. Moore (88-5932) & Charles R. Morse, 917 F.2d 215 (6th Cir. 1990).
· cites it 4× “Moore argues the district court erred by failing to set forth all of the necessary elements required to prove the offense of armed post office robbery pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2114 . At the time of the offense, 18 U.”
United States v. Taylor, 848 F.3d 476 (1st Cir. 2017).
· cites it 2× “§§ 111 (a)(1) and (b), (3) robbery and attempted robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2114 (a), (4) kidnapping under 18 U.”
18 U.S.C. § 2114(a): 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.