18 U.S.C. § 213
Acceptance of loan or gratuity by financial institution examiner
A prior section 213, acts June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 695, § 213, formerly § 218; Pub. L. 85–699, title VII, § 701(b),
Another prior section 213, act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 693, related to the acceptance or demand of a bribe by a customs officer or employee, prior to the general amendment to this chapter by Pub. L. 87–849 and is substantially covered by revised section 201.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1972–2008 · leading case: United States v. Ted Bristol, 473 F.2d 439 (5th Cir. 1973).
United States v. Ted Bristol, 473 F.2d 439 (5th Cir. 1973). “While we recognize that 18 U.S.C.A. § 213 is a penal statute and must be strictly construed, we also note that this rule of construction: does not require that such statute be strained or distorted in order to exclude conduct clearly intended to be within its scope.”
United States v. George G. Davis, 767 F.2d 1025 (2d Cir. 1985). “§ 3292 and amendments to 18 U.S.C. § 213 , a federal court, upon application of the prosecutor, may suspend the running of the statute of limitation for such time (up to three years) as is necessary to obtain evidence from a foreign country.”
United States v. William F. Schoenhut, Jr, 576 F.2d 1010 (3rd Cir. 1978). “1973), in which a bank examiner was found guilty of accepting a loan from a bank official in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 213 (1976), the Government maintains that the loan to Delaware Valley must be viewed for what it truly is — a loan to Greenmeadow/Karlee.”
United States v. Gary R. Walker, 947 F.2d 1439 (10th Cir. 1991). “The defendant in Bristol was a bank examiner who had accepted a loan held to be in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 213 . His primary defense was that the indictment was fatally defective because the loan, although perhaps arranged by a bank officer, was not “made” or “granted” by him…”
United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers & Allied Workers, Union No. 33 v. Edwin Meese, Attorney Gen. of the United States of Am., 823 F.2d 652 (1st Cir. 1987). “§ 212 (1982) (offer of loan or gratuity to bank examiner); 18 U.S.C. § 213 (acceptance of loan or gratuity by bank examiner).”
United States v. Robert Mullens, 583 F.2d 134 (5th Cir. 1978). “2d 308 (1966), and bank examiners, 18 U.S.C.A. § 213 , United States v. Bristol, 473 F.”
State v. Green, 376 A.2d 424 (Del. Super. Ct. 1977). “18 U.S.C.A. § 213 . Other than the provision in the code of ethics quoted above, the only statute bearing on this subject limits the conditions under which a bank or trust company may make loans to its directors, officers, or employees.”
United States v. Bristol, 343 F. Supp. 1262 (S.D. Tex. 1972). “Conjunctively, 18 U.S.C. § 213 states that: Whoever, being an examiner or assistant examiner of member banks of the Federal Reserve System or banks the deposits of which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or a farm credit examiner or examiner of National…”
United States v. Xayaso, 45 F. App'x 843 (10th Cir. 2002). “Phoma Xayaso and Mesa Rith were convicted of armed bank robbery ( 18 U.S.C. § 213 (a) and (d)) and carrying and using a firearm during a crime of violence ( 18 U.”
United States v. Hembree, 312 F. App'x 720 (6th Cir. 2008). “bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 213 (a) and (d), and knowingly possessing a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Fred Napier, 861 F.2d 547 (9th Cir. 1988). “As a result of accepting this loan, Napier was tried and convicted of violating 18 U.S. C. § 213, which provides in relevant part: Whoever, being an examiner or assistant examiner of member banks of the Federal Reserve System or banks the *548 deposits of which are insured by…”
Crandon v. State, 897 P.2d 92 (Kan. 1995). “Moreover, the court stated, even by a cursory review of 18 U.S.C. § 213 , the principle statute thought to be violated, there was no violation under U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.