18 U.S.C. § 2332g
Missile systems designed to destroy aircraft
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: United States v. Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2011).
United States v. Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2011). “[3] Conspiracy to acquire and export SAMs in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g. [4] Conspiracy to provide material support to a known terrorist organization in violation of 18 U.”
Doe v. Ashcroft, 334 F. Supp. 2d 471 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). “§ 3 (2003) (proposed 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a)). 114 . Id. (proposed 18 U.”
United States v. Cromitie (Williams), 727 F.3d 194 (2d Cir. 2013). “Specifically, they point out that their mandatory minimum sentences resulted from convictions on Counts 5 and 6, punishing conspiring and attempting, respectively, to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles (18 U.S.C. § 2332g), and that the idea of planning the use of such…”
United States v. Rami Ghanem, 993 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2021). “GHANEM SUMMARY ** Criminal Law The panel vacated a conviction for conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. § 2332g, which prohibits illicit dealings in guided surface-to-air missiles; vacated the sentence; and remanded for further proceedings.”
United States v. Bout, 731 F.3d 233 (2d Cir. 2013). “§§ 1114 and 1117; (3) conspiracy to acquire and export a missile system designed to destroy aircraft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g 1 ; and (4) conspiracy to provide material support or resources to a designated foreign terrorist organization, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Garavito-Garcia, 827 F.3d 242 (2d Cir. 2016). “§§ 2339B(a)(l) and (d)(1) (Count Three); and conspiracy to acquire and transfer anti-aircraft missiles, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g (Count Four). Garavito-Garcia raises four issues on appeal: (1) that the District Court improperly denied his motion to dismiss the…”
United States v. Kassar, 582 F. Supp. 2d 488 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). “As to Count 3, which charges that defendants conspired to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g, defendants contend that the facts alleged therein fall within section 2332g’s exclusion for “conduct by or under the authority of the United States…”
United States v. Mohanad Hammadi, 737 F.3d 1043 (6th Cir. 2013). “Furthermore, their conspiracy to deliver the surface-to-air missiles violated 18 U.S.C. § 2332g, which the government charged in Count 10.”
Eur. Cmty. v. RJR Nabisco, Inc., 783 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2015). “, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2332g (conduct involving antiaircraft missile systems); 2339D (terrorist military training).”
United States v. Rami Ghanem (9th Cir. 2025). “The district court resentenced Ghanem on remand after this court vacated his jury conviction for conspiring to acquire, transport, and use surface-to-air missiles in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g. The panel rejected all of Ghanem’s arguments that the district court committed…”
United States v. Jack, 257 F.R.D. 221 (E.D. Cal. 2009). “§ 956 (a)) (Count II) and conspiracy to possess missile systems (18 U.S.C. § 2332g) (Count III). All five conspiracy charges relate to the defendants’ alleged participation in a plot to ship weapons to Laos in order to facilitate the overthrow of the communist government of Laos…”
United States v. Yi Qing Chen, 526 F. App'x 772 (9th Cir. 2013). “The district court erred by failing to instruct the jury that the statute underlying Chen’s conviction for conspiracy to acquire missiles designed to destroy aircraft, 18 U.S.C. § 2332g, was enacted during the alleged conspiracy period.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a) — 2 cases
United States v. Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2011). “[3] Conspiracy to acquire and export SAMs in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g. [4] Conspiracy to provide material support to a known terrorist organization in violation of 18 U.”
Doe v. Ashcroft, 334 F. Supp. 2d 471 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). “§ 3 (2003) (proposed 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a)). 114 . Id. (proposed 18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a)(1) — 1 case
United States v. Reza Olangian (2d Cir. 2020).
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a)(3) — 1 case
United States v. Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2011). “[3] Conspiracy to acquire and export SAMs in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g. [4] Conspiracy to provide material support to a known terrorist organization in violation of 18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a)(3)(A) — 1 case
United States v. Kassar, 582 F. Supp. 2d 488 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). “As to Count 3, which charges that defendants conspired to acquire and use anti-aircraft missiles in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g, defendants contend that the facts alleged therein fall within section 2332g’s exclusion for “conduct by or under the authority of the United States…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a)(l) — 2 cases
United States v. Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2011). “[3] Conspiracy to acquire and export SAMs in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g. [4] Conspiracy to provide material support to a known terrorist organization in violation of 18 U.”
Doe v. Ashcroft, 334 F. Supp. 2d 471 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). “§ 3 (2003) (proposed 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a)). 114 . Id. (proposed 18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(c) — 1 case
Doe v. Ashcroft, 334 F. Supp. 2d 471 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). “§ 3 (2003) (proposed 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a)). 114 . Id. (proposed 18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(c)(1) — 1 case
United States v. Rami Ghanem (9th Cir. 2025). “The district court resentenced Ghanem on remand after this court vacated his jury conviction for conspiring to acquire, transport, and use surface-to-air missiles in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2332g. The panel rejected all of Ghanem’s arguments that the district court committed…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(d) — 1 case
Doe v. Ashcroft, 334 F. Supp. 2d 471 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). “§ 3 (2003) (proposed 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a)). 114 . Id. (proposed 18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(e) — 1 case
Doe v. Ashcroft, 334 F. Supp. 2d 471 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). “§ 3 (2003) (proposed 18 U.S.C. § 2332g(a)). 114 . Id. (proposed 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.