18 U.S.C. § 2442
Recruitment or use of child soldiers
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2009–2024 · leading case: United States v. Rogers, 587 F.3d 816 (7th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Rogers, 587 F.3d 816 (7th Cir. 2009). “For this conduct, the government charged Rogers with attempting to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (b), and using the Internet to attempt to transfer obscene material to a minor, 18 U.”
Negusie, 27 I. & N. Dec. 347 (BIA 2018). “3735, making the recruitment of child soldiers abroad a violation of domestic law under 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (Supp. II 2008), as well as grounds of inadmissibility and deportability under sections 212(a)(3)(G) and 237(a)(4)(F) of the Act, 8 U.”
United States v. Eric D. Wagner, 872 F.3d 535 (7th Cir. 2017). “Following a grand jury indictment, Wagner was convicted of knowingly attempting to persuade or induce a minor (“Jen”) to engage in illegal sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (b). C. Sentencing Before the sentencing hearing, the Probation Officer submitted the…”
United States v. Thomas Patrick Keelan, 786 F.3d 865 (11th Cir. 2015). “2(a)(2) because a substantial risk that physical force may be “used,” as provided by § 16(b), is more limited than conduct that “presents” a serious potential risk of injury, • as provided by § 4B1.”
United States v. Mark Joseph Unrein, 688 F. App'x 602 (11th Cir. 2017). “Attempted child enticement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (b), requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant intended to cause a minor “to assent to sexual contact with him” and “took a substantial step toward causing that assent.”
United States v. Daniel, 576 F.3d 772 (7th Cir. 2009). “A grand jury indicted Daniel for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (b), which forbids knowingly persuading, inducing, enticing, or coercing an individual under the age of 18 to engage in criminal sexual activity.”
United States v. Raymond (D.D.C. 2023). “§§ 2244 (a)(2) and 7(9); and one count of coercion and enticement to travel to engage in unlawful sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (a); two counts of sexual abuse in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Paul Montanez (5th Cir. 2019). “Paul Anthony Montanez pleaded guilty to a single count of enticement of a child, which is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (b). Montanez approached the 13-year-old male victim in a park and claimed he wanted to buy his bicycle.”
United States v. Raymond (D.D.C. 2023). “4 §§ 2244(a)(2) and 7(9); and one count of coercion and enticement to travel to engage in unlawful sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (a). Between the Statement of Offense, the Complaint, the Statement of Offense, and the Superseding Indictment, the Government…”
United States v. Raymond (D.D.C. 2023). “§§ 2244 (a)(2) and 7(9); and one count of coercion and enticement to travel to engage in unlawful sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (a). Based on the allegations in that indictment and the substantial litigation this case has incurred and will incur in the…”
United States v. Raymond (D.D.C. 2023). “§§ 2244 (a)(2) and 7(9); and one count of coercion and enticement to travel to engage in unlawful sexual activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (a). Id. Based on the allegations in that indictment and the substantial litigation this case has incurred and will incur in the…”
United States v. Raymond (D.D.C. 2023). “§§ 2244 {a)(2) and 7(9); and one count of coercion and enticement to travel to engage in unlawful sexual 3 REGACTED / CLEARED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE REDACTED / CLEARED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2442 (a). The operative superseding indictment more than…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.