18 U.S.C. § 3195

Payment of fees and costs

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

All costs or expenses incurred in any extradition proceeding in apprehending, securing, and transmitting a fugitive shall be paid by the demanding authority.

All witness fees and costs of every nature in cases of international extradition, including the fees of the magistrate judge, shall be certified by the judge or magistrate judge before whom the hearing shall take place to the Secretary of State of the United States, and the same shall be paid out of appropriations to defray the expenses of the judiciary or the Department of Justice as the case may be.

The Attorney General shall certify to the Secretary of State the amounts to be paid to the United States on account of said fees and costs in extradition cases by the foreign government requesting the extradition, and the Secretary of State shall cause said amounts to be collected and transmitted to the Attorney General for deposit in the Treasury of the United States.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases, 1964–2006 · leading case: Cnty. of Monroe v. State of Florida & State of New York, & Metro. Dade Cnty., Florida, 678 F.2d 1124 (2d Cir. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cnty. of Monroe v. State of Florida & State of New York, & Metro. Dade Cnty., Florida, 678 F.2d 1124 (2d Cir. 1982). · cites it 3× “By order dated June 30, 1980, we dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, since the complaint remained outstanding against the defendant Metropolitan Dade County which was served, appeared and filed an answer, but retained jurisdiction pending the entry by the district…”

United States v. MacUla Anty, 203 F.3d 305 (4th Cir. 2000). “§ 3521 (b) (authorizing the payment of expenses for witnesses under relocation and protection statute); 18 U.S.C. § 3195 (authorizing payment of all “fees and costs of every nature” involving extradition).”

Lapeer Cnty., Michigan, a Mun. Corp. v. Montgomery Cnty., Ohio, a Mun. Corp. Montgomery Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 108 F.3d 74 (6th Cir. 1997). “Lapeer County then brought this action against Montgomery County and the State of Ohio, alleging that defendant’s failure to reimburse Lapeer County violated the Federal Extradition Act, see 18 U.S.C. § 3195 , and the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act, see Ohio Rev.”

St. Charles Cnty., State of Missouri v. State of Wisconsin, 447 F.3d 1055 (8th Cir. 2006). “86, and the County brought suit to recover the expenses, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3195 for subject matter jurisdiction.”

United States v. Vincent Eric Harris, 210 F.3d 165 (3rd Cir. 2000). “17(b) (same); 18 U.S.C. § 3195 (extradition costs); 18 U.”

Colfax Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners v. New Hampshire, 16 F.3d 1107 (10th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “For subject matter jurisdiction, Colfax County relied on 18 U.S.C. § 3195 . 2 This action was summarily dismissed on October 22, 1992.”

United States v. Freeman, 680 F. Supp. 73 (W.D.N.Y. 1988). “The cost involved with the extradition of fugitives is relatively small, with the result that the infringement of a state’s sovereignty should it have to endure suits and be made to pay these sums would be “minimal.”

St. Charles Cty. v. State of WI (8th Cir. 2006). “86, and the County brought suit to recover the expenses, citing 18 U.S.C. § 3195 for subject matter jurisdiction.”

Aristeguieta v. Jimenez, 34 F.R.D. 218 (S.D.N.Y. 1964). · cites it 2× “; 18 U.S.C. § 3195 ) Rule 54(d), F.R.Civ.P.”

United States v. Macula Anty (4th Cir. 2000). “§ 3521 (b) (authorizing the payment of expenses for witnesses under relocation and protection statute); 18 U.S.C. § 3195 (authorizing payment of all "fees and costs of every nature" involving extradition).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.