18 U.S.C. § 3611
Payment of a fine or restitution
A person who is sentenced to pay a fine, assessment, or restitution, shall pay the fine, assessment, or restitution (including any interest or penalty), as specified by the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts. Such Director may specify that such payment be made to the clerk of the court or in the manner provided for under section 604(a)(18) of title 28, United States Code.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1973–2019 · leading case: United States v. Boal, 534 F.3d 965 (8th Cir. 2008).
United States v. Boal, 534 F.3d 965 (8th Cir. 2008). “” 18 U.S.C. § 3611 . If the clerk is the specified recipient, it “shall notify the Attorney General of each receipt of a payment.”
United States v. Richard Lee Mills, 991 F.2d 609 (9th Cir. 1993). “18 U.S.C. § 3611— 3615 (1988 & Supp.1991).”
United States v. James M. Gabriel, Gerard E. Vitti, 125 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 1997). “1214 , 1227-1241 (codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 3611 -3613A, 3663-3664). The MVRA states that it “shall, to the extent constitutionally permissible, be effective for sentencing proceedings in eases in which the defendant is convicted on or after the date of enactment of this Act.”
United States v. Scarboro, 352 F. Supp. 2d 714 (E.D. Va. 2005). “or 18 U.S.C. § 3611 , et seq., or by all other available and reasonable means.”
United States v. Pedro Carrillo Payan, 992 F.2d 1387 (5th Cir. 1993). “§ 3663 provides in part: (h) An order of restitution may be enforced— (1) by the United States— (A) in the manner provided for the collection and payment of fines in subchapter B of chapter 229 of this title [ 18 U.S.C. §§ 3611 et seq.]; or (B) in the .”
United States v. Witham, 648 F.3d 40 (1st Cir. 2011). “Subchapter B of chapter 229 encompasses the statutory sections governing payment and collection of fines and restitution, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3611— 3615. 8 . This language replaced language in the old § 3613(e) that authorized "execution against the property of the person fined in like…”
United States v. Anne Hankins, 858 F.3d 1273 (9th Cir. 2017). “” See 18 U.S.C. § 3611 (stating that restitution payments may be directed to the Clerk of the Court).”
United States v. Cannistraro, 694 F. Supp. 62 (D.N.J. 1988). “”); 18 U.S.C. § 3611 (Supp.IV 1986) (effective November 1, 1987) (“A person who has been sentenced to pay a fine .”
United States v. O'Connor, 321 F. Supp. 2d 722 (E.D. Va. 2004). “Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3611 and 3612, it is the Clerk’s Office that distributes restitution payments to the victims named in the judgment and commitment order.”
United States v. Alexander, 772 F. Supp. 440 (D. Minnesota 1990). “1987) ( 18 U.S.C. § 3611 ); United States v. Sandini, 816 F.”
United States v. David Connell Cox, 487 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1973). “” Appellant contends that the only act proscribed by the United States Code resembling the alleged offense attributed by Griffin to Cox is “Firearms possessed by a convicted felon,” 18 U.S.C.A. § 3611 , and that the section is completely inapplicable to the circumstances in…”
United States v. Mendez-Perez Mendez-Ramirez, 607 F. App'x 39 (2d Cir. 2015). “In light of (1) the mismatch between the district court’s stated intention (to have the money flow to the victim through restitution) and the sentence it imposed (a fine, which is payable to the government independent of the restitution order, see generally 18 U.S.C. § 3611 );…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.