18 U.S.C. § 37
Violence at international airports
1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–132, § 723(a)(1), inserted “or conspires” after “attempts” in concluding provisions.
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 104–132, § 721(g), inserted subpar. (A) designation and added subpar. (B).
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 104–294 inserted heading and inserted “, and the term ‘State’ means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States” before period at end.
Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60021(c),
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1984–2025 · leading case: Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227 (1999).
Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227 (1999). “§ 928 (b)(2) (assault by a member of the armed forces); 18 U. S. C. § 37 (a)(1) (violence at international airports); § 1091(a)(2) (genocide).”
United States v. Adam Gardenhire, 784 F.3d 1277 (9th Cir. 2015). “§ 32 (a)(1) (willfully setting fire to an aircraft), 18 U.S.C. § 37 (intentionally performing an act of violence against a person at an airport), 18 U.”
United States v. William Joseph Harris, 243 F.3d 806 (4th Cir. 2001). “§ 928 (b)(2); 18 U.S.C. § 37 (a)(1); and 18 U.S.C. § 1091 (a)(2)).”
Charangeet Singh-Kaur v. John Ashcroft, Attorney Gen. United States of Am., 385 F.3d 293 (3rd Cir. 2004). “§ 32 ; violence at international airports, 18 U.S.C. § 37 ; prohibitions with respect to biological weapons, 18 U.”
United States v. Thekkedajh Peethamb Menon, 24 F.3d 550 (3rd Cir. 1994). “We first note that until recently, the Supreme Court generally interpreted “defraud” to extend to actions preventing the government from carrying out its lawful functions even when the government did not lose any revenue.”
United States v. William E. Butner, United States of Am. v. William E. Butner, 277 F.3d 481 (4th Cir. 2002). “William Eugene Butner appeals, challenging his convictions for bankruptcy fraud and conspiracy to commit bankruptcy fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 37 and 152(1). Finding no error, we affirm both *484 convictions.”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Resnick, 604 F. Supp. 2d 773 (D. Maryland 2009). “¶¶ 55, 57, 59, & 61); and (3) he engaged in a conspiracy to do all of the above in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 37 {id. ¶¶ 46-51), a conspiracy which included false record-keeping in violation of 15 U.”
United States v. Defreitas, 718 F.3d 115 (2d Cir. 2013). “On June 28, 2007, a grand jury indicted the defendants on the above charges, as well as a charge of conspiracy to destroy international airport facilities, in violation *120 of 18 U.S.C. §§ 37 (a), 37(b)(1), and 37(b)(2).”
United States v. Geoffry Kouevi, 698 F.3d 126 (3rd Cir. 2012). “1 A federal grand jury subsequently returned a two-count indictment charging Kouevi with conspiracy to commit visa fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 37 , and visa fraud, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Madhatta Haipe, 769 F.3d 1189 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “, 18 U.S.C. § 37 (prohibiting violence at international airports, both within and outside of the United States).”
United States v. Ibrahim, 529 F. App'x 59 (2d Cir. 2013). “§ 32 (a)(8); Count Four with conspiracy to destroy international airport facilities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 37 (a), (b)(1), and (b)(2); and Count Five with conspiracy to attack a mass transportation facility, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Munir, 953 F. Supp. 2d 470 (E.D.N.Y 2013). “See 18 U.S.C. § 37 ; Min. Entry, Jan. 7, 2013, ECF No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.