18 U.S.C. § 714
Repealed. Pub. L. 97–258, § 2(d)(1)(B), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1058]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases, 1928–1998 · leading case: Williams v. New York, 337 U.S. 241 (1949).
Williams v. New York, 337 U.S. 241 (1949). “819 , 18 U.S.C. §§ 714 , 716, now §§ 4202, 4203.”
United States v. Carlton E. Wilson, 159 F.3d 280 (7th Cir. 1998). “18 U.S.C. § 714 . The prohibition in section 922(g)(8) is one of the most obscure.”
United States v. Greenhaus, 85 F.2d 116 (2d Cir. 1936). “Similarly in legislating for the parole of prisoners who have served one-third of their sentences, Congress has made the eligibility of a prisoner for parole dependent on serving “one-third of the total of such term or terms for which he was sentenced.”
Christianson v. Zerbst, 89 F.2d 40 (10th Cir. 1937). “If the warden of the penitentiary or prison from which he was paroled or the parole board or any member thereof shall have reliable information that the prisoner has violated his parole, the warden may at any time within the term or terms of the sentence issue a warrant to…”
Sims v. Rives, 84 F.2d 871 (D.C. Cir. 1936). “650 ( 18 U.S.C.A. § 714 ). It is again speculative to say what this might have been.”
United States Ex Rel. Anderson v. Anderson, 76 F.2d 375 (8th Cir. 1935). “650 [18 USCA § 714 et seq.], where a federal convict breaks his parole and is retaken under a warden’s warrant, the Board of Parole may revoke his parole at any time before his sentence has been fully served and require him to complete his term of imprisonment without deduction…”
Aderhold v. Lee, 68 F.2d 824 (5th Cir. 1934). “18 USCA § 714 and following. The Act of May 14, 1930, § 7, 18 USCA § 753f, gave very broad control to the Attorney General over the place of confinement of all persons convicted of an offense against the United State and over their transfer.”
Stockton v. Massey, 34 F.2d 96 (4th Cir. 1929). “650 • (18 USCA §§ 714 to 722). One of the conditions of the parole was that the appellant would live and remain at liberty without violating the law.”
Zerbst v. Kidwell, 92 F.2d 756 (5th Cir. 1937). “By section 4 of the act ( 18 U.S.C.A. § 717 ), upon reliable information tending to show violation of parole the warden was authorized to issue his warrant for retaking the prisoner at any time within the term of the prisoner’s sentence.”
United States Ex Rel. Gutterson v. Thompson, 47 F. Supp. 150 (E.D.N.Y 1942). “The Court in this instance observed: “Conceding that the Board of Parole is without jurisdiction to issue a warrant for, and retake, a prisoner after the expiration of ‘the term or terms of the prisoner’s sentence’, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 714 to 719, the appellant cannot complain.”
Hauck v. Hiatt, 141 F.2d 812 (3rd Cir. 1944). “See 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 714 and 716. Language expressive of legislative intent could not be plainer.”
Adams v. Hudspeth, 121 F.2d 270 (10th Cir. 1941). “” Conceding that the Board of Parole is without jurisdiction to issue a warrant for, and retake, a prisoner after the expiration of “the term or terms of the prisoner’s sentence”, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 714 to 719, the appellant cannot complain.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.