19 U.S.C. § 1306
Repealed. Pub. L. 107–171, title X, § 10418(a)(5), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 507
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1961–1982 · leading case: United States v. Sam C. Martino, Joseph C. Russello & Rolando Gonzalez Rodriguez, 681 F.2d 952 (5th Cir. 1982).
United States v. Sam C. Martino, Joseph C. Russello & Rolando Gonzalez Rodriguez, 681 F.2d 952 (5th Cir. 1982). “§§ 3618 & 3619 (forfeiture of conveyances used to introduce intoxicants into Indian territories); 19 U.S.C. § 1306 (forfeiture of unwholesome imported meat); 19 U.”
Ness Produce Co. v. Short, 263 F. Supp. 586 (D. Or. 1966). “19 U.S.C. § 1306 (b); 21 U.S.C. §§ 71-91 ; 9 C.”
Armour & Co. v. State, 270 F. Supp. 941 (D. Neb. 1967). “No question exists under the agreed statement as to the necessary jurisdictíonal amount under 28 U.”
Tupman Thurlow Co. v. Todd, 230 F. Supp. 230 (M.D. Ala. 1964). “This statute recites, among other things, that all imported meats shall “after entry into the United States in compliance with such rules and regulations, be deemed and treated as domestic meats * * *.” The preliminary injunction as prayed for by the plaintiff, The Tupman…”
Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 177 (Cust. Ct. 1961). “[ 19 U.S.C. § 1306 (b).] The regulations adopted under congressional authority expressed in section 306(b) specifically include Canada as one of the eligible countries from which horsemeat and horsemeat food products may be imported, into the United States, and provide as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.