19 U.S.C. § 1316
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1934–1985 · leading case: United States v. Dom. Fuel Corp., 71 F.2d 424 (C.C.P.A. 1934).
United States v. Dom. Fuel Corp., 71 F.2d 424 (C.C.P.A. 1934). “Thus, section 316 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 USCA § 1316) reads: “Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to abrogate *433 or in any manner impair or affect the provisions of the treaty of commercial reciprocity concluded between the United States and the Republic of Cuba…”
Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United States, 9 Ct. Int'l Trade 262 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1985). “19 U.S.C. § 1316 (d) (1982) provides: No administrative ruling resulting in the imposition of a higher rate of duty or charge than the Secretary of the Treasury shall find to have been applicable to imported merchandise under an established and uniform practice shall be…”
Von Damm v. United States, 90 F.2d 263 (C.C.P.A. 1937). “” Section 316 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C.A. § 1316 ) reads as follows: “Sec.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.