19 U.S.C. § 1352a
Repealed. Pub. L. 87–794, title II, § 257(f), Oct. 11, 1962, 76 Stat. 882
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1958–1970 · leading case: Texas Am. Asphalt Corp. v. Walker, 177 F. Supp. 315 (S.D. Tex. 1959).
Texas Am. Asphalt Corp. v. Walker, 177 F. Supp. 315 (S.D. Tex. 1959). “1781 ), 19 U.S. C.A. § 1352a note. Plaintiff also seeks a declaratory judgment that it is entitled to import such crude oil at the rate of 10,000 barrels per day.”
Atl. Refining Co. v. Stand. Oil Co., 304 F.2d 387 (D.C. Cir. 1962). “3279 of March 10, 1959, as amended, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1352a note, to be illegal, and that any method of allocation of imported foreign *389 crude oil that distributes quotas in an inverse ratio to size of refinery inputs is illegal.”
E. States Petroleum & Chem. Corp. v. Walker, 177 F. Supp. 328 (S.D. Tex. 1959). “1781 ), 19 U.S.C.A. § 1352a note. Plaintiff also seeks a declaratory judgment that it is entitled to an import allocation larger than it received under the program and that the Oil Import Appeals Board wrongfully denied its appeal for an increased allocation.”
E. States Petroleum & Chem. Corp. v. Seaton, 165 F. Supp. 363 (D.D.C. 1958). “166 , 19 U.S.C.A. § 1352a provides: “In order to further the policy and purpose of this section, whenever the Director of the Office of Defense Mobilization has reason to believe that any article is being imported into the United States in such quantities as to threaten to…”
Skelly Oil Co. v. Russell, 436 F.2d 910 (D.C. Cir. 1970). “678 , 19 U.S.C. § 1352a (1958). Section 2 of the Act of July 1, 1954 was repealed by Pub.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.