19 U.S.C. § 1354

Notice of intention to negotiate agreement; opportunity to be heard; President to seek information and advice

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar

Before any foreign trade agreement is concluded with any foreign government or instrumentality thereof under the provisions of this part, reasonable public notice of the intention to negotiate an agreement with such government or instrumentality shall be given in order that any interested person may have an opportunity to present his views to the President, or to such agency as the President may designate, under such rules and regulations as the President may prescribe; and before concluding such agreement the President shall request the International Trade Commission to make the investigation and report provided for by section 1360 of this title, and shall seek information and advice with respect to such agreement from the Departments of State, Agriculture, Commerce, and Defense, and from such other sources as he may deem appropriate.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1949–1960 · leading case: United States v. Carpenter, 113 F. Supp. 327 (E.D.N.Y 1949).
United States v. Carpenter, 113 F. Supp. 327 (E.D.N.Y 1949). “§ 624 (b), and the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.A. §§ 1354 , 1357-1359, there are certain restrictions against and conditions upon executive proclamations which limit the total quantity of any article that may be entered into the United States.”
Aris Gloves, Inc. v. United States, 281 F.2d 954 (C.C.P.A. 1958). “698 ), 19 U.S.C.A. § 1354 , amending the Tariff Act of 1930, provided in part, as follows: “Before any foreign trade agreement is concluded with any foreign government or instrumentality thereof under the provisions of this Act, reasonable public notice of the intention to…”
Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. United States, 169 F. Supp. 268 (Cust. Ct. 1958). · cites it 2× “" 19 U.S.C.A. § 1354 . We are of opinion that, in view of the long-prescribed reciprocal trade procedures, upheld by the United States Supreme Court, the provisions of the Trade Agreements Act of 1934 set up standards sufficient to protect it against the weaknesses found by the…”
Aris Gloves, Inc. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 257 (Cust. Ct. 1960). · cites it 3× “The condition precedent referred to is that required by section 4 of the Trade Agreements Act of 1934, as amended ( 19 U.S.C. § 1354 ), and paragraph 5 of Executive Order No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.