U.S. Code » Title 19 » Chapter CHAPTER 4— TARIFF ACT OF 1930 › Subtitle SUBTITLE III— ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS › Part Part III— Ascertainment, Collection, and Recovery of Duties

19 U.S.C. § 1482

Repealed. Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, § 690(b)(8), Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2223

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1992–1997 · leading case: United States v. Thorson Chem. Corp., 795 F. Supp. 1190 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Thorson Chem. Corp., 795 F. Supp. 1190 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1992). · cites it 2× “1-11 (emphasis added); see also 19 U.S.C. §§ 1482 (b), 1484, 1485 (1988).”
United States v. Hitachi Am., Ltd., 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 373 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997). “Thus, because CIA invoiced MARTA for MVA payments but CIJ did not invoice Hitachi America for MVA pay-raents, there was no illegal double invoicing for MVA in violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1482 (b). The understatedyen amount would equal the dollar value declared on the entry…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.