19 U.S.C. § 1489
Repealed. Pub. L. 87–456, title III, § 301(a), May 24, 1962, 76 Stat. 75
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47
cases, 1947–2004 · leading case: Lincoln Gen. Ins. v. United States, 341 F. Supp. 2d 1265 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2004).
Lincoln Gen. Ins. v. United States, 341 F. Supp. 2d 1265 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2004). “In Fidelity, a surety on a single consumption entry bond was held to be a proper party to file a petition for remission of additional duties under 19 U.S.C. § 1489 . The court found that a surety has all the rights and remedies that are available to the principal on an import…”
William G. Young & Co. v. Dyer, 112 F. Supp. 1 (S.D.N.Y. 1953). “It seems likely, though there is no direct evidence on tlie point, that Bonaventure ran the business of Creations Simonne for the defendant at this address.”
Florea & Co. v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 57 (Cust. Ct. 1950). “Mollison, Judge: This is a petition filed under the provisions of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U. S. C. § 1489 ) for the remission of additional duties assessed by reason of the fact that the final appraised value of certain men’s wool knit gloves imported into the…”
Crown Publishers v. United States, 25 Cust. Ct. 159 (Cust. Ct. 1950). “Colb, Judge; In this case, petitioner has invoked the provisions of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U. S. C. § 1489 ) to obtain remission of additional duties accruing by reason of the final appraised value exceeding the entered value on certain books exported from…”
Orlikoff v. United States, 31 Cust. Ct. 350 (Cust. Ct. 1953). “Ekwall, Judge: This is a petition for remission of additional duties filed under authority of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U. S. C. § 1489 ). The merchandise, which was entered at values lower than those found on final appraisement, consisted of three importations…”
Charles T. Wilson Co. v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 66 (Cust. Ct. 1950). “Additional duties accrued by reason of the appraiser’s advance over the entered value, and to obtain remission of such duties, petitioner, invoking the provisions of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U. S. C. §1489 ), has brought the present case before us.”
Corrigan v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 331 (Cust. Ct. 1949). “Johnson, Judge: This petition for the remission of additional duties assessed under authority of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U. S. C. § 1489 , involves 6,630 1-pound packages of dried bananas advanced in value by the appraiser, thus causing an assessment thereon of…”
Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 603 (Cust. Ct. 1950). “case, supra, the appellate court was reviewing a judgment of the trial court which had denied a petition for remission of additional duties assessed by the collector of *606 customs pursuant to section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1922 ( 19 U. S. C. § 1489 ). It appears from the…”
Ideal Container Co. v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 361 (Cust. Ct. 1952). “Cole, Judge: The provisions of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U. S. C. § 1489 ) are invoked herein to obtain the remission of additional duties that accrued by reason of the final appraised value exceeding the entered value of paperboard exported from Finland and…”
Newland, Schneelock & Piek, Inc. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 288 (Cust. Ct. 1959). “Lawrence, Judge: This is a petition for the remission of additional duties assessed pursuant to section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. § 1489 ), prior to its amendment by the Customs Simplification Act of 1953 ( 67 Stat.”
Corrigan v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 347 (Cust. Ct. 1949). “Johnson, Judge: These petitions for the remission of additional duties assessed under authority of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U. S. C. § 1489 , involve two shipments of bobby pins imported from Mexico, which were advanced in value by the appraiser, and pertain to…”
Alvarez v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 303 (Cust. Ct. 1950). “Cole, Judge: The provisions of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U. S. C. § 1489 ) are invoked in this case to obtain remission of additional duties accruing by reason of the final appraised values exceeding the entered values of several items of leather goods exported…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.