19 U.S.C. § 1500

Appraisement, classification, and liquidation procedure

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar
The Customs Service shall, under rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary—(a) fix the final appraisement of merchandise by ascertaining or estimating the value thereof, under section 1401a of this title, by all reasonable ways and means in his power, any statement of cost or costs of production in any invoice, affidavit, declaration, other document to the contrary notwithstanding;(b) fix the final classification and rate of duty applicable to such merchandise;(c) fix the final amount of duty to be paid on such merchandise and determine any increased or additional duties, taxes, and fees due or any excess of duties, taxes, and fees deposited;(d) liquidate the entry and reconciliation, if any, of such merchandise; and(e) give or transmit, pursuant to an electronic data interchange system, notice of such liquidation to the importer, his consignee, or agent in such form and manner as the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe.(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 500, 46 Stat. 729; Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 887, § 4(b), 70 Stat. 948; Pub. L. 91–271, title II, § 204(a), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 283; Pub. L. 96–39, title II, § 202(a)(4), July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 202; Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, § 638, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2203.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 500, 42 Stat. 965. That section was superseded by section 500 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.

Provisions dealing with the subject matter of subdivision (a) of this section were contained in act Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 16, § III, K, 38 Stat. 185, reenacting without change the provisions of the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, § 10, 26 Stat. 136, as reenacted by the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of Aug. 5, 1909, ch. 6, § 28, 36 Stat. 97. A provision somewhat similar to subdivision (a)(5) of this section was contained in section III, M, of the 1913 act, the provisions of which were substituted for provisions of the same nature contained in section 13 of the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, as amended by the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of Aug. 5, 1909, ch. 6, § 28, 36 Stat. 99. Said section III of the 1913 act was repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 643, 42 Stat. 989.

R.S. §§ 2609, 2610, relative to merchant appraisers, were superseded by the provisions relating to appraisers and appraisements in the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, 26 Stat. 131, and later acts, and were repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 642, 42 Stat. 989.

R.S. § 2902 prescribed the mode of appraisal of merchandise, prior to repeal by the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, § 29, 26 Stat. 141.

R.S. § 2911 required appraisers to adopt the value of the best article in a package containing articles wholly or in part of wool or cotton of similar kind but different quality, charged at an average price, and R.S. § 2912 related to appraisal of wool of different qualities when imported in the same bale, bag, or package, and of bales of different qualities when embraced in the same invoice, prior to repeal by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 642, 42 Stat. 989.

R.S. § 2945 imposed a penalty on any merchant chosen by the collector to make any appraisement required under any act respecting imports and tonnage, who should, after due notice, decline or neglect to assess at such appraisement. This section was repealed by the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, § 29, 26 Stat. 141, and was again repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 642, 42 Stat. 989.

R.S. § 2946 related to the ascertainment of value at ports where there were no appraisers, prior to repeal by section 642 of the act of Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356.

A prior provision similar to subdivision (b) was contained in act Oct. 3, 1913, ch. 16, § III, M, 38 Stat. 186, the provisions of which were substitutes for those of the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, § 13, 26 Stat. 136, as amended by the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of Aug. 5, 1909, ch. 6, § 28, 36 Stat. 99. Section III, M, was repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 643, 42 Stat. 989.

An earlier provision on the subject was contained in R.S. § 2929, prior to repeal by Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, § 29, 26 Stat. 141.

Somewhat similar to subdivision (d), R.S. § 2943 provided that one of the assistant appraisers at the port of New York should be detailed for the supervision of examination of merchandise damaged on the voyage of importation, and to make examinations and appraisals and to report, etc. It was repealed, with R.S. § 2927, which provided for appraisal of such goods, and other sections, by the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, § 29, 26 Stat. 141, reenacted and designated as section 28 by the Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act of Aug. 5, 1909, ch. 6, § 28, 36 Stat. 104.

Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–182, § 638(1), substituted “The Customs Service” for “The appropriate customs officer” in introductory provisions.

Subd. (a). Pub. L. 103–182, § 638(2), substituted “fix the final appraisement of” for “appraise”.

Subd. (b). Pub. L. 103–182, § 638(3), substituted “fix the final” for “ascertain the”.

Subd. (c). Pub. L. 103–182, § 638(4), inserted “final” after “fix the” and “, taxes, and fees” after “duties” in two places.

Subds. (d) and (e). Pub. L. 103–182, § 638(5), amended subds. (d) and (e) generally. Prior to amendment, subds. (d) and (e) read as follows:

“(d) liquidate the entry of such merchandise; and

“(e) give notice of such liquidation to the importer, his consignee, or agent in such form and manner as the Secretary shall prescribe in such regulations.”

1979—Subd. (a). Pub. L. 96–39 substituted “by ascertaining or estimating the value thereof, under section 1401a of this title, by all reasonable ways and means in his power, any statement of cost or costs of production in any invoice, affidavit, declaration, or other document” for “in the unit of quantity in which the merchandise is usually bought and sold by ascertaining or estimating the value thereof by all reasonable ways and means in his power, any statement of cost or costs of production in any invoice, affidavit, declaration, or other document”.

1970—Pub. L. 91–271 struck out “(a)” preceding first sentence and, in such provisions, as so redesignated, substituted provisions which set forth the customs functions to be performed by the appropriate customs officer for provisions which set forth the customs functions to be performed by the appraiser, and struck out subds. (b) to (f), which allocated specific customs functions to appraisers, assistant and deputy appraisers, and examiners, and authorized the designation of acting appraisers where necessary.

1956—Subd. (f). Act Aug. 2, 1956, struck out “take the oath,” before “perform all the duties” in second sentence, and struck out comma after “perform all duties”.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 1979 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–39 effective July 1, 1980, see section 204(a) of Pub. L. 96–39, set out as a note under section 1401a of this title.

Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Pub. L. 91–271, title II, § 203, June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 283, provided that: “Titles II and III of this Act [see Short Title of 1970 Amendment note set out under section 1654 of this title] shall take effect with respect to articles entered, or withdrawn, from warehouse for consumption, on or after October 1, 1970, and such other articles entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to such date, the appraisement of which has not become final before October 1, 1970, and for which an appeal for reappraisement has not been timely filed with the Bureau of Customs [now the United States Customs Service] before October 1, 1970, or with respect to which a protest has not been disallowed in whole or in part before October 1, 1970.”

Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.

Executive DocumentsTransfer of Functions

Functions of all officers of Department of the Treasury and functions of all agencies and employees of such Department transferred, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Treasury, with power vested in him to authorize their performance or performance of any of his functions, by any of such officers, agencies, and employees, by Reorg. Plan No. 26 of 1950, §§ 1, 2, eff. July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 4935, 64 Stat. 1280, 1281, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 204 cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1950–2025 · leading case: United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001).
United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001). · cites it 2× “Title 19 U. S. C. § 1500 (b) provides that Customs "shall, under rules *222 and regulations prescribed by the Secretary [of the Treasury,] .”
Volkswagen of Am., Inc. v. United States, 532 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2008). · cites it 8× “To support its argument, VW also cites to 19 U.S.C. § 1500 , which discusses in separate subsections that Customs shall "fix the final appraisement of merchandise" and "liquidate the entry.”
Hutchison Quality Furniture, Inc. v. United States, 827 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2016). · cites it 2× “19 U.S.C. §§ 1500 (c)-(d), 1504(d). Had Hutchison intended its action to concern Commerce’s liquidation instructions, we suspect it would have included an additional count with the relevant allegations and legal authority.”
Price v. Stevedoring Servs. of Am., Inc., 697 F.3d 820 (9th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “” 19 U.S.C. § 1500 (b). In addition, the Secretary had promulgated regula- tions authorizing the Customs Service to issue “ruling letters” 10452 PRICE v.”
United States v. Haggar Apparel Co., 526 U.S. 380 (1999). · cites it 2× “19 U. S. C. § 1500 (b). In addition, the Secretary is directed by statute to "establish and promulgate such rules and regulations not inconsistent with the law .”
Sunpreme Inc. v. United States, 924 F.3d 1198 (Fed. Cir. 2019). · cites it 3× “3d at 794 (quoting 19 U.S.C. § 1500 (c) ). As the Majority recognizes, see Majority Op.”
Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, & U.S. Magnesium LLC, 472 F.3d 1347 (Fed. Cir. 2006). “19 U.S.C. § 1500 (d); 19 C.F.R. § 159.1 .”
Solarworld Americas, Inc. v. United States, Yingli Green Energy Holding Co., 910 F.3d 1216 (Fed. Cir. 2018). “According to SolarWorld, these Customs rulings are "uniquely instructive.”
New Zealand Lamb Co., Inc. v. United States, 40 F.3d 377 (Fed. Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “This final computation was made by Customs pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1500 (Supp. V 1993), which sets forth the appraisement, classification, and liquidation tasks that Customs shall perform.”
LG Elec. U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 21 Ct. Int'l Trade 1421 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997). · cites it 3× “§ 1504 (a) (1994) (deemed liquidation), or by order of Customs, 19U.S.C.§ 1500 (1994). Plaintiff contends that the 54 entries at issue have yet to be liquidated because decisions to liquidate were not made and proper notices of liquidation were not given.”
Forest Labs., Inc. v. United States, 403 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005). · cites it 2× “See 19 U.S.C. § 1500 (1994). The general power to modify the HTSUS belongs exclusively to Congress.”
Former Employees of Comput. Sciences Corp. v. United States Sec'y of Labor, 414 F. Supp. 2d 1334 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). · cites it 3× “U.S. Secretary of Labor (“EDS I”), 28 CIT-,-, 350 F.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.