U.S. Code » Title 19 » Chapter CHAPTER 4— TARIFF ACT OF 1930 › Subtitle SUBTITLE III— ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS › Part Part III— Ascertainment, Collection, and Recovery of Duties

19 U.S.C. § 1511

Repealed. Pub. L. 95–410, title I, § 107, Oct. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 892

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1978–2004 · leading case: United States v. Molt, 444 F. Supp. 491 (E.D. Pa. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Molt, 444 F. Supp. 491 (E.D. Pa. 1978). · cites it 2× “If such failure continues for a period of one year from the date of such instructions the appropriate customs officer shall cause the merchandise, unless previously exported, to be sold at public auction as in the case of forfeited merchandise.”
Cemex, S.A. v. United States, 384 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “Does 19 U.S.C. § 1511 (a) Grant Domestic Producers The Right To Judicial Review? The trial court noted that “[i]f a deemed liquidation or any liquidation is adverse to an importer, it has protest remedies under 19 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.