19 U.S.C. § 1556
Bonded warehouses; regulations for establishing
The Secretary of the Treasury shall from time to time establish such rules and regulations as may be necessary for the establishment of bonded warehouses and to protect the interests of the Government in the conduct, management, and operation of such warehouses and in the withdrawal of and accounting for merchandise deposited therein.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1937–1993 · leading case: R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Durham Cnty., 479 U.S. 130 (1986).
R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Durham Cnty., 479 U.S. 130 (1986). “8 , where, as in this case, Congress has entrusted an agency with the task of promulgating regulations to carry out the purposes of a statute, see 19 U. S. C. § 1556 , as part of the pre-emption analysis we must consider whether the regulations evidence a desire to occupy a…”
North Carolina Ass'n of Elec. Tax Filers, Inc. v. Graham, 429 S.E.2d 544 (N.C. 1993). “The federal statute at issue was 19 U.S.C. § 1556 , and in deciding the preemption question in favor of the state, the Court said: Nor is there any suggestion that [ad valorem] taxation here would conflict with the central purpose behind the customs-bonded warehouses: to ensure…”
Ameritrade Corp. v. Carnes, 637 F. Supp. 1213 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1986). “19 U.S.C. § 1556 (1982). It is reasonable for Customs to condition conferral of that privilege upon compliance with all Customs regulations.”
United States v. Hy-Grade Match Co., 18 F. Supp. 226 (S.D.N.Y. 1937). “” Authority for making necessary regulations “for the establishment of bonded warehouses and to protect the interests of the Government” in their conduct and in the withdrawal of merchandise therefrom is found in title 19 U.S.C. § 1556 ( 19 U.S.C.A. § 1556 ). In the preceding…”
Baltimore Sec. Warehouse Co. v. United States, 9 Ct. Int'l Trade 641 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1985). “Customs has authority under 19 U.S.C. § 1556 (1982) to promulgate rules and regulations for establishing bonded warehouses.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.