19 U.S.C. § 1616
Repealed. Pub. L. 99–570, title I, § 1863(b), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–54
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1985–1996 · leading case: United States v. Ursery, 518 U.S. 267 (1996).
United States v. Ursery, 518 U.S. 267 (1996). “And 19 U. S. C. § 1616 , which governs the burden of proof in forfeiture proceedings under §§881 and 981, provides that once the Government has shown probable cause that the property is subject to forfeiture, then “the burden of proof shall lie upon [the] claimant.”
United States v. Certain Real Prop. & Premises Known as 38 Whalers Cove Drive, 747 F. Supp. 173 (E.D.N.Y 1990). “§ 881 (e)(1)(A) and 19 U.S.C. § 1616 (a)(2). Forfeiture of Levin’s approximately $70,-000 interest in the condominium does not seem a grossly excessive amount for his share of the costs of remedying the ills occasioned by drugs.”
Auth. to Transfer Forfeited Prop. to the Gen. Servs. Admin. for Potential Sale to a Mun. (OLC 1985). “3 Section 881(e) also provides that the A ttorney General may: (1) retain the [forfeited] property for official use or transfer the custody or ow nership or any forfeited property to any Federal, State, o r local agency pursuant to [ 19 U.S.C. §1616 ]; (2) sell any forfeited…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.