19 U.S.C. § 1652
Separability
If any provision of this chapter, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the chapter, and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1938–1976 · leading case: United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs, 402 U.S. 363 (1971).
United States v. Thirty-Seven (37) Photographs, 402 U.S. 363 (1971). “See 19 U. S. C. § 1652 . Nor does the construction of § 1305 (a) to include specific time limits require us to decide issues of policy appropriately left to the Congress or raise other questions upon which Congress possesses special legislative expertise, for Congress has…”
John E. Wiren v. Donald Eide, as Dist. Dir. of the Bureau of Customs, 542 F.2d 757 (9th Cir. 1976). “19 U.S.C. § 1652 . See also National Equipment Rental, Ltd.”
Wislar v. United States, 97 F.2d 152 (C.C.P.A. 1938). “* * * ” Appellant’s argument is that the Tariff Act of 1930 carries a provision (section 652, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1652 ) similar to that above quoted from the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, and that, since the Reciprocal Trade Agreement Act is an amendment to the Tariff…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.