U.S. Code » Title 19 » Chapter CHAPTER 12— TRADE ACT OF 1974 › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— RELIEF FROM INJURY CAUSED BY IMPORT COMPETITION › Part Part 2— Adjustment Assistance for Workers › Subpart subpart c— general provisions

19 U.S.C. § 2312

Administration absent State agreement

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Promulgation of regulations; fair hearing

In any State where there is no agreement in force between a State or its agency under section 2311 of this title, the Secretary shall arrange under regulations prescribed by him for performance of all necessary functions under subpart B of this part, including provision for a fair hearing for any worker whose application for payments is denied.

(b) Review of final determination

A final determination under subsection (a) with respect to entitlement to program benefits under subpart B of this part is subject to review by the courts in the same manner and to the same extent as is provided by section 405(g) of title 42.

(Pub. L. 93–618, title II, § 240, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2025.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesTermination Date

No trade adjustment assistance, vouchers, allowances, or other payments or benefits may be provided under this part after June 30, 2022, except as otherwise provided, see section 285 of Pub. L. 93–618, as modified by section 406(a)(7) of Pub. L. 114–27, set out as notes preceding section 2271 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1955–2026 · leading case: Harry James Flynn v. United States, 217 F.2d 29 (9th Cir. 1955).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harry James Flynn v. United States, 217 F.2d 29 (9th Cir. 1955). “…competent counsel arid found guilty and sane at the time of the commission of the act. The judgment is affirmed. 1 . 19 U.S.C.A. § 2312 .”
Lloyd v. U. S. Dep't of Labor, 637 F.2d 1267 (9th Cir. 1980). “§ 2311 (if administration is through a state agency) or by 19 U.S.C. § 2312 (b) (if not state administration).”
Oregon v. United States, 2026 CIT 47 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2026). · cites it 2× “11012”) invoking Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2312 . Compl. (Mar. 5, 2026) (“State Compl.”
Oregon v. United States, 2026 CIT 53 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2026). “11012”), which invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2312 . See Compl. (Mar. 5, 2026), ECF No.”
Former Employees of J.S. Designers, Inc. v. United States, 13 Ct. Int'l Trade 583 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1989). “19 U.S.C. § 2312 (b) (1982). *584 II The plaintiffs letter also stated that he has not found an attorney, and explained that finding an attorney is like "looking for a 'needle in a haystack.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.