19 U.S.C. § 2316

Penalties

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever makes a false statement of a material fact knowing it to be false, or knowingly fails to disclose a material fact, for the purpose of obtaining or increasing for himself or for any other person any payment authorized to be furnished under this part or pursuant to an agreement under section 2311 of this title shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1984–2013 · leading case: United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997). · cites it 2× “§ 1919 (maximum two year prison term for knowingly making false statement of material fact with intent to influence tariff adjustment); 19 U. S. C. § 2316 (maximum one year prison term for knowingly making false statement of material fact when seeking relief from injury under…”
United States v. Michael E. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 1994). “§ 1919 (maximum two year prison term for knowingly making false statement of material fact with intent to influence tariff adjustment); 19 U.S.C. § 2316 (maximum one year prison term for knowingly making false statement of material fact when seeking relief from injuiy under…”
Ficek v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 481 A.2d 1247 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1984). “357 , 887, (Amending 19 U.S.C. §2316 (1974)) (1981).”
Former Employees of Welex, Inc. v. U. S. Sec'y of Labor, 2008 CIT 143 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2008). “” Language in the signature block section of the petition form sternly cautions workers that “[k]nowingly falsifying any information on this Petition Form is a Federal offense ( 18 USC § 1001 ) and a violation of the Trade Act ( 19 USC § 2316 ).” See A.R. 2 (TAA/ATAA petition…”
Former Employees of Weather Shield Mfg., Inc. v. United States Sec'y of Labor, 2013 CIT 85 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2013). “§ 1001 ) and is a violation of the Trade Act ( 19 U.S.C. § 2316 ). By signing the below, I agree to the following statement: “Under penalty of law, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief the information I have provided in this document is true, correct, and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.