U.S. Code
»
Title 19
» Chapter CHAPTER 12— TRADE ACT OF 1974 › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER II— RELIEF FROM INJURY CAUSED BY IMPORT COMPETITION › Part Part 6— Adjustment Assistance for Farmers
19 U.S.C. § 2401d
Benefit information to agricultural commodity producers
(a) In generalThe Secretary shall provide full information to agricultural commodity producers about the benefit allowances, training, and other employment services available under this subchapter and about the petition and application procedures, and the appropriate filing dates, for such allowances, training, and services. The Secretary shall provide whatever assistance is necessary to enable groups to prepare petitions or applications for program benefits under this subchapter.
(b) Notice of benefits(1) In generalThe Secretary shall mail written notice of the benefits available under this part to each agricultural commodity producer that the Secretary has reason to believe is covered by a certification made under this part.
(2) Other noticeThe Secretary shall publish notice of the benefits available under this part to agricultural commodity producers that are covered by each certification made under this part in newspapers of general circulation in the areas in which such producers reside.
(3) Other Federal assistanceThe Secretary shall also provide information concerning procedures for applying for and receiving all other Federal assistance and services available to workers facing economic distress.
(Pub. L. 93–618, title II, § 295, as added Pub. L. 107–210, div. A, title I, § 141(a), Aug. 6, 2002, 116 Stat. 949.)Termination of AssistanceFor termination of assistance under this part after June 30, 2022, see Termination Date note below.
Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesTermination DateExcept as otherwise provided, technical assistance and financial assistance may not be provided under this part after June 30, 2022, see section 285 of Pub. L. 93–618, as modified by section 406(a)(7) of Pub. L. 114–27, set out as notes preceding section 2271 of this title.
Notes of Decisions
Former Employees of Fisher & Co. v. United States Dep't of Labor, 507 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
“2d 1349 (CIT 2006), where the court found that the petitioner had successfully stated a case for equitable tolling by arguing that the Department of Agriculture’s Farm Service Agency did not properly notify her that her class had been recertified for benefits, as was required by…”
Truong v. United States Sec'y of Agric., 484 F. Supp. 2d 1324 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
· cites it 3× “Truong brought suit before the court, claiming that the FSA did not properly provide her with notice of the recertification of benefits, as required by 19 U.S.C. § 2401d, 4 and contending therefore that the filing deadline should be equitably tolled.”
Truong v. United States Sec'y of Agric., 461 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006).
· cites it 2× “Truong brought suit before the court claiming that the FSA did not properly provide her notice of the recertification of benefits as required under 19 U.S.C. § 2401d. Therefore, Mrs. Truong contends that the filing deadline should be equitably tolled.”
Kyong Truong v. United States Sec'y of Agric., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 542 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
· cites it 3× “Truong brought suit before the court, claiming that the FSA did not properly provide her with notice of the recertifi-cation of benefits, as required by 19 U.S.C. § 2401d, 4 and contending therefore that the filing deadline should be equitably tolled.”
Kyong Truong v. United States Sec'y of Agric., 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1512 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006).
· cites it 2× “Truong brought suit before the court claiming that the FSA did not properly provide her notice of the recertification of benefits as required under 19 U.S.C. § 2401d. Therefore, Mrs. Truong contends that the filing deadline should be equitably tolled.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 2401d(b)(l) — 2 cases
Truong v. United States Sec'y of Agric., 484 F. Supp. 2d 1324 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
“Truong brought suit before the court, claiming that the FSA did not properly provide her with notice of the recertification of benefits, as required by 19 U.S.C. § 2401d, 4 and contending therefore that the filing deadline should be equitably tolled.”
Kyong Truong v. United States Sec'y of Agric., 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 542 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2007).
“Truong brought suit before the court, claiming that the FSA did not properly provide her with notice of the recertifi-cation of benefits, as required by 19 U.S.C. § 2401d, 4 and contending therefore that the filing deadline should be equitably tolled.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.