19 U.S.C. § 261
Omitted
[omitted]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1988–2019 · leading case: Bull v. United States, 479 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2007).
Bull v. United States, 479 F.3d 1365 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “Then, on August 3, 2004, the government moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), arguing that the plaintiffs’ claims should be dismissed because “the Customs Officer Pay Reform Act (COPRA or the Act), 19 U.”
Bull v. United States, 63 Fed. Cl. 580 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “Defendant seeks to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims on the ground that the Customs Officer Pay Reform Act (COPRA or the Act), 19 U.S.C. §§ 261 , 267 (2000), enacted in 1993, 2 is the exclusive pay system for CEOs, excluding them from coverage under FLSA.”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. United States, 20 Cl. Ct. 490 (Ct. Cl. 1990). “§ 1451 , the statute implementing 1911 overtime] requires a bond from the licensee to ‘pay the compensation and expenses of the customs officers,’ but the payment must be made to the collector under § 5 [the predecessor to 19 U.”
Barbieri v. United States, 15 Cl. Ct. 747 (Ct. Cl. 1988). “Plaintiffs, customs agents working in Key West, assert that they served as boarding officers during this refugee operation and on that basis claim entitlement to the extra compensation allowed for such services pursuant to 19 U.S.C. §§ 261 , 267 (1982). This suit was brought to…”
United States Dep't of the Treasury, United States Customs Serv. v. Fed. Labor Relations Auth., 43 F.3d 682 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “See 19 U.S.C. § 261 (1988) (repealed 1993). In 1990, the Customs Service adopted the Coastwise Advanced Preliminary Entry (CAPE) program for its operations in the Southeastern United States.”
Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. United States, 24 Cl. Ct. 1562 (Fed. Cir. 1991). “Claims Court, on motion for summary judgment, that the Government was not required to pay the inspectors the statutory overtime pay rate supplied by 19 U.S.C. §§ 261 , 267 (1988), 1 for reporting for duty in connection with the Mariel boatlift.”
Bailey v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2019). “312 , 668-72 (codified as amended at 19 U.S.C. §§ 261 , 267). The COPRA amended the Act of 1911 to provide for double-time pay rates for officially assigned overtime work and to replace the Act of 1911’s pay increments with premium pay.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.