19 U.S.C. § 3301
Repealed. Pub. L. 116–113, title VI, § 601, Jan. 29, 2020, 134 Stat. 78
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1997–2018 · leading case: Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 517 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 517 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “" 19 U.S.C. § 3301 (emphasis added). Section 101, in turn, provides that "the Congress approves (1) the North American Free Trade Agreement.”
Merck & Co., Inc. v. United States, 499 F.3d 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2007). “* * * (4)(A) Effective upon the entry into force of the North American Free Trade Agreement, the exportation to a NAFTA country, as defined in section 2(4) of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act [ 19 U.S.C. § 3301 (4)], of merchandise that is fungible with…”
Merck & Co., Inc. v. United States, 435 F. Supp. 2d 1253 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2006). “(4)(A) Effective upon the entry into force of the North American Free Trade Agreement, the exportation to a NAFTA country, as defined in section 2(4) of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act [ 19 U.S.C.A. § 3301 (4)], of merchandise that is fungible with and…”
Porteadores Del Noroeste S.A. De, C.V. v. Indus. Comm'n, 316 P.3d 1241 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2014). “; see also 19 U.S.C.A §§ 3301 to -3473. The Implementation Act provides: No State law, or the application thereof, may be declared invalid as to any person or circumstance on the ground that the provision or application is inconsistent with [NAFTA], except in an action brought…”
Silfab Solar, Inc. v. United States, 296 F. Supp. 3d 1295 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018). “2057 (1993) (codified at 19 U.S.C. §§ 3301 - 3473 ), under which a global safeguard action taken under the Trade Act affecting imports of an article of Canada or Mexico "proclaiming a quantitative restriction shall permit the importation of a *1301 quantity or value of the…”
Application of Collins, 561 N.W.2d 209 (Neb. 1997). “The explicit language of the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, 19 U.S.C. § 3301 et seq. (1994), states that NAFTA does not provide a private remedy and may not be invoked in order to invalidate any “action or inaction by any .”
United States v. Ford Motor Co., 516 F. Supp. 2d 770 (W.D. Tex. 2007). “See 19 U.S.C.A. § 3301 , et seq. (West 2005 & Supp.”
Canadian Lumber Trade All. v. United States, 517 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2008). “” 19 U.S.C. § 3301 (emphasis added). Section 101, in turn, provides that “the Congress approves — (1) the North American Free Trade Agreement.”
Auth. to Withdraw from the North Am. Free Trade Agreement (OLC 2018). “19 U.S.C. § 3301 (4). Section 109(b), entitled “Termination of NAFTA Status,” provides that, “[d]uring any period in which a country ceases to be a NAFTA country, sections 101 through 106 shall cease to have effect with respect to such country.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.