19 U.S.C. § 3513

Implementing actions in anticipation of entry into force; regulations

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Implementing actionsAfter December 8, 1994(1) the President may proclaim such actions, and(2) other appropriate officers of the United States Government may issue such regulations,as may be necessary to ensure that any provision of this Act, or amendment made by this Act, that takes effect on the date any of the Uruguay Round Agreements enters into force with respect to the United States is appropriately implemented on such date. Such proclamation or regulation may not have an effective date earlier than the date of entry into force with respect to the United States of the agreement to which the proclamation or regulation relates.(b) Regulations

Any interim regulation necessary or appropriate to carry out any action proposed in the statement of administrative action approved under section 3511(a) of this title to implement an agreement described in section 3511(d)(7), (12), or (13) of this title shall be issued not later than 1 year after the date on which the agreement enters into force with respect to the United States.

(Pub. L. 103–465, title I, § 103, Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4819.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 103–465, Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4809, known as the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3501 of this title and Tables.

Executive DocumentsUruguay Round Agreements: Entry Into Force

The Uruguay Round Agreements, including the World Trade Organization Agreement and agreements annexed to that Agreement, as referred to in section 3511(d) of this title, entered into force with respect to the United States on Jan. 1, 1995. See note set out under section 3511 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2018–2024 · leading case: Comm. Overseeing Action for Lumber v. United States, 66 F.4th 968 (Fed. Cir. 2023).
Comm. Overseeing Action for Lumber v. United States, 66 F.4th 968 (Fed. Cir. 2023). · cites it 2× “§ 1677f-1, as implemented by Com- merce under URAA § 103(a), 19 U.S.C. § 3513 (a). See Co- alition III, 483 F.”
Comm. Overseeing Action for Lumber Int'l Trade Investigations or Negotiations v. United States, 2020 CIT 167 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2020). · cites it 2× “” 19 U.S.C. § 3513 (a)(2). At issue in this case is the scope of rulemaking authority granted by section 103(a).”
Comm. Overseeing Action for Lumber Int'l Trade Investigations or Negot. v. United States, 2024 CIT 50 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2024). · cites it 2× “3 In the decision memorandum accompanying the Final Results, Commerce relied on section 103(a) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA” or “the Act”), 19 U.S.C. § 3513 (a), as authority for the promulgation of 19 C.”
Comm. Overseeing Action for Lumber Int'l Trade Investigations or Negotiations v. United States, 2019 CIT 136 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2019). · cites it 2× “§ 1675 ; rather Commerce relied on section 103(a) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (“URAA”), 19 U.S.C. § 3513 (a), in conjunction with Article 19.”
Irving Paper Ltd. v. United States, 2018 CIT 22 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2018). “§§ 3511 - 3513, and Defendant responding that the authority lies in 19 U.S.C. § 3513 (a), which authorizes Commerce to promulgate the necessary regulations to ensure compliance with the Uruguay Round Agreement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.