U.S. Code » Title 19 » Chapter CHAPTER 22— URUGUAY ROUND TRADE AGREEMENTS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— APPROVAL OF, AND GENERAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO, URUGUAY ROUND AGREEMENTS › Part Part B— Tariff Modifications

19 U.S.C. § 3524

Consultation and layover requirements for, and effective date of, proclaimed actions

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar
If a provision of this Act provides that the implementation of an action by the President by proclamation is subject to the consultation and layover requirements of this section, such action may be proclaimed only if—(1) the President has obtained advice regarding the proposed action from—(A) the appropriate advisory committees established under section 2155 of this title, and(B) the International Trade Commission;(2) the President has submitted a report to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate that sets forth—(A) the action proposed to be proclaimed and the reasons for such actions, and(B) the advice obtained under paragraph (1);(3) a period of 60 calendar days, beginning with the first day on which the President has met the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2) with respect to such action, has expired; and(4) the President has consulted with such committees regarding the proposed action during the period referred to in paragraph (3).(Pub. L. 103–465, title I, § 115, Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4828.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 103–465, Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4809, known as the Uruguay Round Agreements Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3501 of this title and Tables.

Executive DocumentsDelegation of Authority

Functions of President under this section delegated to the United States Trade Representative by par. (4) of Proc. No. 6969, Jan. 27, 1997, 62 F.R. 4417.

Authority of President to perform certain functions in order to fulfill consultation and layover requirements set forth in this section delegated to United States Trade Representative by Memorandum of President of the United States, Sept. 29, 1995, 60 F.R. 52061, set out as a note under section 3311 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2005 · leading case: Kemet Elec. Corp. v. Barshefsky, 976 F. Supp. 1012 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kemet Elec. Corp. v. Barshefsky, 976 F. Supp. 1012 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997). “§ 2155 and 19 U.S.C. § 3524 were met. See id. at 86-88 .”
Kemet Elec. Corp. v. Barshefsky, 969 F. Supp. 82 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1997). · cites it 2× “The “consultation and layover requirements” are set forth in 19 U.S.C. § 3524 . Section 3524 requires the President, inter alia, to obtain “advice regarding the proposed action from — (A) the appropriate advisory committees established under section 2155 of this title, and (B)…”
Pillsbury Co. v. United States, 368 F. Supp. 2d 1319 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2005). “(b) Other tariff modifications Subject to the consultation and layover requirements of [ 19 U.S.C. § 3524 ], the President may proclaim- (1) the modification of any duty or staged rate reduction of any duty set forth in Schedule XX if — • (A) the United States agrees to such…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.