19 U.S.C. § 3553
Membership in WTO of boycotting countries
It is the sense of the Congress that the Trade Representative should vigorously oppose the admission into the World Trade Organization of any country which, through its laws, regulations, official policies, or governmental practices, fosters, imposes, complies with, furthers, or supports any boycott described in section 4607(a) of title 50 (as in effect on
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1997–2007 · leading case: United States v. Kenneth Higgins, 128 F.3d 138 (3rd Cir. 1997).
United States v. Kenneth Higgins, 128 F.3d 138 (3rd Cir. 1997). “3 (a) creates a presumption in favor of a consecutive sentence, sentencing judges are free to depart from the Guidelines and order a downward departure, so long as they comply with the procedures required for downward departure in general outlined in 19 U.”
United States v. Raney, 226 F. App'x 378 (5th Cir. 2007). “2d 975 (2006) (noting that an upward departure is not an abuse of the district court’s discretion when it advances the objectives set forth in 19 U.S.C. § 3553 (a)(2) and is justified by the facts of the case).”
United States v. Herrera, 118 F. App'x 448 (10th Cir. 2004). “Herrera was not offered a plea agreement, but pleaded guilty “with the hope and the possibility that he may qualify for the safety valve [ 19 U.S.C. § 3553 (f) and USSG § 5C1.2].” Aplt’s App.”
United States v. Herrera, 166 F. App'x 309 (10th Cir. 2006). “Herrera was not offered a plea agreement, but pleaded guilty “with the hope and the possibility that he may qualify for the safety valve [ 19 U.S.C. § 3553 (f) and USSG § 5C1.2].” Aplt’s App.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.