19 U.S.C. § 483
Repealed. Sept. 1, 1954, ch. 1213, title V, § 502, 68 Stat. 1140
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1927–1982 · leading case: The United States of Am. v. Emanuel Lester, 247 F.2d 496 (2d Cir. 1957).
The United States of Am. v. Emanuel Lester, 247 F.2d 496 (2d Cir. 1957). “§ 545 ; the second with aiding in such unlawful importation in violation of 19 U.S.C.A. § 483 ; and the third with conspiring unlawfully to import merchandise in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Pac. Fin. Corp., 110 F.2d 732 (2d Cir. 1940). “Claimant asserts that under the statute upon which the United States relies, 19 U. S.C.A. § 483,' seizure and forfeiture can be had of a vehicle only while it is being used in violation of the statute, and not for an act committed some time in the past and no longer in progress.”
United States v. One 1976 Mercedes 450 SLC, 667 F.2d 1171 (5th Cir. 1982). “Section 1595a of Title 19 is derived from 19 U.S.C. § 483 (1952) “with no important change in substance.”
United States v. One Oldsmobile Sedan, 23 F. Supp. 323 (D. Or. 1938). “I have been furnished with a copy of a letter under date January 24th of this year by the Honorable Brien McMahon, Assistant Attorney General, Chief of the Criminal Department of the Department of Justice, setting out the Government’s view, that the amendment of August 5, 1935,…”
United States v. One Reo Sedan, 39 F.2d 120 (D. Mass. 1930). “167, 170 , made this observation: “Section 3062 [19 USCA § 483] provides that ‘such vehicle,’ namely, a vehicle which has been found by an officer to be in use in transporting or conveying smuggled property, shall be liable to seizure and forfeiture.”
United States v. Joseph Wing Leong, 287 F.2d 849 (7th Cir. 1961). “The former section, Title 19 U.S.C.A. § 483 (b) read: “ * * * any person who assists, finances, directs, or is otherwise concerned in the unlading, bringing in, importation, landing, removal, concealment, harboring, or subsequent transportation of any such merchandise exceeding…”
Seijo v. United States, 20 F.2d 904 (1st Cir. 1927). “This is an appeal from a decree of forfeiture by the United States District Court for Porto Rico of the American schooner Ernestina, under sections 584 and 594 of the Tariff Act of 1922 (19 USCA §§ 486, 498) and section 3062 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (19 USCA…”
In re Ford Sedan, 1937 Model, etc., 26 F. Supp. 146 (D. Minnesota 1938). “A very comprehensive brief has been filed with the Court by the United States Attorney setting forth in great detail-the difference between the old statute and the amended statute of August 5, 1935, 19 U.S.C.A. § 483 , and I am convinced that Congress intended to frame a…”
United States v. One Hudson Coach, 57 F.2d 539 (W.D.N.Y. 1932). “This action is in libel to declare a forfeiture of the automobile by virtue of the provisions of section 3062 of the Revised Statutes (19 USCA § 483) and section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (26 USCA § 1181).”
United States v. One Oldsmobile Sedan, 30 F. Supp. 254 (D. Mass. 1939). “This is a libel for forfeiture of an Oldsmobile Sedan alleged to have been used in the transportation of narcotics in violation of 19 U.S.C.A. § 483 . A claim and an answer have been filed by one Ruth L.”
United States v. One Chevrolet Truck, 62 F. Supp. 670 (S.D. Tex. 1945). “254 , it is held that mere lack of knowledge of the owner of the automobile which was seized in violation of a statute prohibiting transportation of narcotics, that the automobile so used in violation of law, did not constitute a defense to the Government’s libel for forfeiture…”
The Reidun, 14 F. Supp. 771 (E.D.N.Y 1936). “Code, title 19, § 483(a), 19 U.S.C.A. § 483 (a). Two causes of forfeiture are stated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.