19 U.S.C. § 506
Repealed. Aug. 5, 1935, ch. 438, title II, § 203(b), 49 Stat. 523
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1927–1933 · leading case: United States v. Blackwood, 47 F.2d 849 (1st Cir. 1931).
United States v. Blackwood, 47 F.2d 849 (1st Cir. 1931). “There is no question as to the authority of these officers to seize an American vessel “which shall become liable to seizure by virtue of any law respecting the revenue, as well without as within their respective districts.”
Fish v. Brophy, 52 F.2d 198 (S.D.N.Y. 1931). “The court declared their authority was not so limited, and that it extended to American vessels on the high seas, by virtue of section 3072 of the Revised Statutes (19 USCA § 506). Justices Holmes and Brandéis concurred in a separate opinion, upon the ground that the Coast Guard…”
United States v. 146,157 Gallons of Alcohol, 3 F. Supp. 450 (D.N.J. 1933). “But even though it were held that because the specific authority to board and search has, with one or two exceptions, been contained in laws primarily for the protection of the revenue, and that, therefore, such right can be exercised only for the purpose of protecting the…”
United States v. 579 Sacks of Whisky, 23 F.2d 882 (D. Mass. 1927). “The evidence, however, warrants a finding that the liquor was first seized by state officers without a warrant, and then by the federal officers also without a warrant. As will presently appear, they had sufficient reason for regarding this liquor as contraband, liable to…”
The Mary, 59 F.2d 771 (D. Mass. 1932). “§ 3072, 19 USCA § 506. It is now well settled that when a vessel has violated the tariff laws and thereby become subject to forfeiture, the vessel can be seized anywhere, even upon the high seas.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.