19 U.S.C. § 81b
Establishment of zones
The Board is authorized, subject to the conditions and restrictions of this chapter and of the rules and regulations made thereunder, upon application as hereinafter provided, to grant to corporations the privilege of establishing, operating, and maintaining foreign-trade zones in or adjacent to ports of entry under the jurisdiction of the United States.
Each port of entry shall be entitled to at least one zone, but when a port of entry is located within the confines of more than one State such port of entry shall be entitled to a zone in each of such States, and when two cities separated by water are embraced in one port of entry, a zone may be authorized in each of said cities or in territory adjacent thereto. Zones in addition to those to which a port of entry is entitled shall be authorized only if the Board finds that existing or authorized zones will not adequately serve the convenience of commerce.
In granting applications preference shall be given to public corporations.
In case of any State in which harbor facilities of any port of entry are owned and controlled by the State and in which State harbor facilities of any other port of entry are owned and controlled by a municipality, the Board shall not grant an application by any public corporation for the establishment of any zone in such State, unless such application has been authorized by an Act of the legislature of such State (enacted after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases, 1967–2006 · leading case: Goodman Mfg., L.P. v. United States, 69 F.3d 505 (Fed. Cir. 1995).
Goodman Mfg., L.P. v. United States, 69 F.3d 505 (Fed. Cir. 1995). “2533, 2533-34; see also 19 U.S.C. § 81b(a) (1994). A foreign-trade zone is “an isolated, fenced off, and policed area within or adjacent to a port of entry.”
Miami Free Zone Corp., Inc. v. Foreign Trade Zones Bd., United States Dep't of Com., United States of Am., 22 F.3d 1110 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “19 U.S.C. § 81b(b) (1988). In addition to this zone, the Board may authorize additional zones in each port if it determines that the existing ones do not adequately serve the convenience of commerce.”
Torrington Co. v. United States, 17 Ct. Int'l Trade 199 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1993). “19 U.S.C. § 81b (1988). Pursuant to the statute, merchandise brought into a FTZ may be *206 exempt from U.”
Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones Bd., 855 F. Supp. 1306 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1994). “See 19 U.S.C. § 81b (1988). The grantee of a zone—District here—has the authority to permit others to operate within the zone subject to the approval of the Board.”
Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones Bd., 885 F. Supp. 257 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1995). “These two provisions complement the Board’s general grants of authority which Congress has set forth in 19 U.S.C. §§ 81b(a), 81g (1988). 2 The Board has promulgated several regulations which facilitate its administration of the trade zones.”
Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones Bd., 914 F. Supp. 620 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1996). “” 19 U.S.C. § 81b(b) (1988). Plaintiff argues “commerce” as used in the FTZA means “foreign-trade.”
CITGO v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Rev., 845 So. 2d 558 (La. Ct. App. 2003). “NOTES [1] Foreign Trade Zones are authorized by 19 U.S.C. § 81b. A Foreign Trade Zone is an area located in or adjacent to a United States Customs port of entry.”
Fountain v. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc., 265 F. Supp. 630 (E.D. La. 1967). “19 U.S.C. § 81b (d). 16 . Although it has been held that the Dock Board is not a corporation, its status as an agency of the State of Louisiana is beyond question.”
Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., U.S.A. v. The United States, 884 F.2d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 1989). “” 19 U.S.C. § 81b(a). “Merchandise” may be brought into a foreign trade zone for the purposes set forth in the statute “without being subject to the customs laws of the United States.”
Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones Bd., 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1297 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1996). “See 19 U.S.C. § 81b(b) (1988). Finally, plaintiff asserted the Board’s failure to offer it a right of first refusal to operate the FTZ in Wynwood precluded the Board from finding FTZ No.”
Arbor Foods Inc. v. United States, 97 F.3d 534 (Fed. Cir. 1996). “Thus, we will examine Customs’ interpretation of section 81c(a) to see if it is plausible.”
Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., USA v. United States, 693 F. Supp. 1183 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988). “19 U.S.C. § 81b(a) *1185 (1982). In 1952 the Board promulgated regulations pursuant to 19 U.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 81b(a) — 11 cases
Goodman Mfg., L.P. v. United States, 69 F.3d 505 (Fed. Cir. 1995). “2533, 2533-34; see also 19 U.S.C. § 81b(a) (1994). A foreign-trade zone is “an isolated, fenced off, and policed area within or adjacent to a port of entry.”
Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones Bd., 885 F. Supp. 257 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1995). “These two provisions complement the Board’s general grants of authority which Congress has set forth in 19 U.S.C. §§ 81b(a), 81g (1988). 2 The Board has promulgated several regulations which facilitate its administration of the trade zones.”
Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., U.S.A. v. The United States, 884 F.2d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 1989). “” 19 U.S.C. § 81b(a). “Merchandise” may be brought into a foreign trade zone for the purposes set forth in the statute “without being subject to the customs laws of the United States.”
Conoco, Inc. v. United States Foreign-Trade Zones Bd., 855 F. Supp. 1306 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1994). “See 19 U.S.C. § 81b (1988). The grantee of a zone—District here—has the authority to permit others to operate within the zone subject to the approval of the Board.”
Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., USA v. United States, 693 F. Supp. 1183 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1988). “19 U.S.C. § 81b(a) *1185 (1982). In 1952 the Board promulgated regulations pursuant to 19 U.”
— 19 U.S.C. § 81b(b) — 5 cases
Miami Free Zone Corp., Inc. v. Foreign Trade Zones Bd., United States Dep't of Com., United States of Am., 22 F.3d 1110 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “19 U.S.C. § 81b(b) (1988). In addition to this zone, the Board may authorize additional zones in each port if it determines that the existing ones do not adequately serve the convenience of commerce.”
Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones Bd., 914 F. Supp. 620 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1996). “” 19 U.S.C. § 81b(b) (1988). Plaintiff argues “commerce” as used in the FTZA means “foreign-trade.”
Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones Bd., 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 1297 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1996). “See 19 U.S.C. § 81b(b) (1988). Finally, plaintiff asserted the Board’s failure to offer it a right of first refusal to operate the FTZ in Wynwood precluded the Board from finding FTZ No.”
Armco Steel Corp. v. Stans, 303 F. Supp. 262 (S.D.N.Y. 1969).
Miami Free Zone Corp. v. Foreign-Trade Zones Bd., 136 F.3d 1310 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
— 19 U.S.C. § 81b(c) — 1 case
Fountain v. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc., 265 F. Supp. 630 (E.D. La. 1967). “19 U.S.C. § 81b (d). 16 . Although it has been held that the Dock Board is not a corporation, its status as an agency of the State of Louisiana is beyond question.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.