U.S. Code » Title 2 » Chapter CHAPTER 5— LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

2 U.S.C. § 140

Employees; fitness

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

All persons employed in and about said Library of Congress under the Librarian shall be appointed solely with reference to their fitness for their particular duties.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1981–2014 · leading case: Terveer v. Billington, 34 F. Supp. 3d 100 (D.D.C. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Terveer v. Billington, 34 F. Supp. 3d 100 (D.D.C. 2014). · cites it 4× “In addition, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant’s discriminatory acts violated his rights under' the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fifth Amendment, the Library of Congress Act, 2 U.S.C. § 140 , and various Library of Congress policies and regulations prohibiting…”
Harry Kenneth Clark v. Library of Cong., 750 F.2d 89 (D.C. Cir. 1984). · cites it 2× “He asserts that his political associations and the investigation into those associations were considered in connection with his job applications in *104 violation of the Library of Congress Act, 2 U.S.C. § 140 . Clark also claims that the full field investigation and the…”
Schroer v. Billington, 525 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C. 2007). · cites it 2× “She also presses claims under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Library of Congress Act, 2 U.S.C. § 140 . Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint, or in the alternative, for judgment on the pleadings.”
Schroer v. Billington, 424 F. Supp. 2d 203 (D.D.C. 2006). “Constitution, and the Library of Congress Act, 2 U.S.C. § 140 . The defendant moves to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”
Jephunneh Lawrence v. Elmer B. Staats, 640 F.2d 427 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “, citing and quoting 2 U.S.C. § 140 (1970); see Civil Rights Act of 1964, § 717(b), as amended by Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, § 11, 42 U.”
Clark v. United States, 229 Ct. Cl. 570 (Ct. Cl. 1981). “shall be appointed solely with reference for their fitness for particular duties,” merely establishes a general guideline for the Library to follow in its personnel practices.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.