2 U.S.C. § 439a
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1975–2016 · leading case: Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976). “" 2 U. S. C. § 439a (1970 ed., Supp. IV). This provision undercuts whatever marginal role the expenditure limitations might otherwise play in enforcing the contribution ceilings.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “BCRA § 301; FECA § 313; 2 U.S.C. § 439a. b. "The Millionaire Provisions": Sections 30A, 316, &319 In Sections 304, 316, and 319 of BCRA, Congress allowed opponents of self-financed candidates to raise money in larger increments and, in certain circumstances, to accept unlimited…”
Schonberg v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 792 F. Supp. 2d 14 (D.D.C. 2011). “The question presented by the Commission’s motion to dissolve is whether Schonberg’s constitutional challenge to BCRA § 301, codified as amended at 2 U.S.C. § 439a, is properly before this three-judge district court.”
Buckley v. Valeo, 519 F.2d 821 (D.C. Cir. 1975). “This latter argument avails plaintiffs nothing, for 2 U.S.C. § 439a 103 permits an officeholder or successful candidate for federal office to apply unspent contributions to “defray any ordinary and necessary expenses incurred by him in connection with his duties as a holder of…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Craig for U.S. Senate, 816 F.3d 829 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “81 , 95 (codified at 2 U.S.C. § 439a and recodified at 52 U.S.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Craig for U.S. Senate, 933 F. Supp. 2d 111 (D.D.C. 2013). “The FEC Has Stated A Claim That Defendants Violated 2 U.S.C. § 439a A. Statutory Framework Section 439a(a) permits the use of campaign funds in five specific instances, including: (1) for otherwise authorized expenditures in connection with the campaign for Federal office of the…”
James Bunning v. Commonwealth of Kentucky & Kentucky Registry of Election Fin., an Indep. Agency of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, 42 F.3d 1008 (6th Cir. 1994). “These advisory opinions, however, are concerned principally with whether the use of funds contributed to federal campaigns for other purposes is lawful under 2 U.S.C. § 439a. The advisory opinions address the situation in which federal campaign funds are transferred or donated…”
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “” 2 U.S.C. § 439a(a)(4). This ability to freely transfer money between, among, and to political committees is available only to party committees and committees affiliated with the same corporation, union or other entity.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Craig for U.S. Senate, 70 F. Supp. 3d 82 (D.D.C. 2014). “All of pleadings in this case, as well as the Court's previous opinion, refer to the relevant portion of the FECA as 2 U.S.C. § 439a(b). *87 As of September 1, 2014, however, that provision was recodified at 52 U.”
Philip M. Stern v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 921 F.2d 296 (D.C. Cir. 1990). “§ 441a(a)(2)(A) ($5,000 limit per candidate per election), and recent amendments prohibiting most members of Congress from using excess campaign funds for personal matters, see 2 U.S.C.A. § 439a (West Supp.1990), speak to the concerns underlying Stern’s contention.”
Stern v. Gen. Elec. Co., 924 F.2d 472 (2d Cir. 1991). “See 2 U.S.C. § 439a (1988). 9 Given that the conversion of funds to personal use was lawful, we cannot see how contributions made with the knowledge that such conversion might take place would, in themselves, violate the statute.”
Tierney v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 538 F. Supp. 2d 99 (D.D.C. 2008). “7 (b) and to 2 U.S.C. § 439a to support his plea for this Court to fill a statutory gap are not persuasive.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 439a(a)(4) — 1 case
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “” 2 U.S.C. § 439a(a)(4). This ability to freely transfer money between, among, and to political committees is available only to party committees and committees affiliated with the same corporation, union or other entity.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 439a(a)(l) — 1 case
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Craig for U.S. Senate, 933 F. Supp. 2d 111 (D.D.C. 2013). “The FEC Has Stated A Claim That Defendants Violated 2 U.S.C. § 439a A. Statutory Framework Section 439a(a) permits the use of campaign funds in five specific instances, including: (1) for otherwise authorized expenditures in connection with the campaign for Federal office of the…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 439a(b) — 3 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Craig for U.S. Senate, 933 F. Supp. 2d 111 (D.D.C. 2013). “The FEC Has Stated A Claim That Defendants Violated 2 U.S.C. § 439a A. Statutory Framework Section 439a(a) permits the use of campaign funds in five specific instances, including: (1) for otherwise authorized expenditures in connection with the campaign for Federal office of the…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Craig for U.S. Senate, 70 F. Supp. 3d 82 (D.D.C. 2014). “All of pleadings in this case, as well as the Court's previous opinion, refer to the relevant portion of the FECA as 2 U.S.C. § 439a(b). *87 As of September 1, 2014, however, that provision was recodified at 52 U.”
United States v. Taff, 400 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (D. Kan. 2005).
— 2 U.S.C. § 439a(b)(2) — 1 case
United States v. Taff, 400 F. Supp. 2d 1270 (D. Kan. 2005).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.