U.S. Code » Title 2 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— DISCLOSURE OF FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FUNDS

2 U.S.C. § 441j

Repealed. Pub. L. 96–187, title I, § 105(1), Jan. 8, 1980, 93 Stat. 1354

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

[repealed]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1977–2009 · leading case: United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). · cites it 5× “If the Commission determines that there is probable cause to believe a “knowing and willful” violation as defined in 2 U.S.C. § 441j has occurred, it may refer the matter to the Attorney General for criminal prosecution without prior conciliation efforts, 2 U.”
State v. Doyen, 580 P.2d 1351 (Kan. 1978). “(2 U.S.C. § 441j.) In its report to the 1974 Kansas legislature, the interim legislative committee which studied the regulation of political campaign expenditures and contributions recommended a bill which required both the candidate and his treasurer to certify to the…”
Common Cause v. Nat'l Archives & Records Serv., 628 F.2d 179 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 441j(a) (1976). Both before the FECA and thereafter, knowing receipt of corporate campaign contributions was stated as a separate offense.”
Marcus v. Holder, 574 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2009). “But the provision is identical in all relevant respects to a provision in the FECA prior to the 1979 amendments, then located at 2 U.S.C. § 441j(b). See Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1976 § 112, 90 Stat.”
United States v. Tonry, 433 F. Supp. 620 (E.D. La. 1977). “2 U.S.C. § 441j(b) and (c)(2). However, conciliation proceedings are not required when the Commission determines that there is probable cause to believe that a knowing and willful violation of the Act has occurred or is about to occur.”
Walther v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 468 F. Supp. 1235 (D.D.C. 1979). · cites it 2× “8 See 2 U.S.C. § 441j (1976). Section 441a(a)(5) is designed “to prevent corporations, labor organizations, or other persons or groups of persons from evading the contribution limits.”
Jon Marcus v. Eric H. Holder Jr. (9th Cir. 2009). “But the provision is identical in all relevant respects to a provision in the FECA prior to the 1979 amendments, then located at 2 U.S.C. § 441j(b). See Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1976 § 112, 90 Stat.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441j(a) — 1 case
Common Cause v. Nat'l Archives & Records Serv., 628 F.2d 179 (D.C. Cir. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 441j(a) (1976). Both before the FECA and thereafter, knowing receipt of corporate campaign contributions was stated as a separate offense.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441j(b) — 4 cases
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “If the Commission determines that there is probable cause to believe a “knowing and willful” violation as defined in 2 U.S.C. § 441j has occurred, it may refer the matter to the Attorney General for criminal prosecution without prior conciliation efforts, 2 U.”
Marcus v. Holder, 574 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2009). “But the provision is identical in all relevant respects to a provision in the FECA prior to the 1979 amendments, then located at 2 U.S.C. § 441j(b). See Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1976 § 112, 90 Stat.”
United States v. Tonry, 433 F. Supp. 620 (E.D. La. 1977). “2 U.S.C. § 441j(b) and (c)(2). However, conciliation proceedings are not required when the Commission determines that there is probable cause to believe that a knowing and willful violation of the Act has occurred or is about to occur.”
Jon Marcus v. Eric H. Holder Jr. (9th Cir. 2009). “But the provision is identical in all relevant respects to a provision in the FECA prior to the 1979 amendments, then located at 2 U.S.C. § 441j(b). See Federal Election Campaign Act Amendments of 1976 § 112, 90 Stat.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441j(c) — 1 case
United States v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, Local 701, & Russell E. Joy, 638 F.2d 1161 (9th Cir. 1980). “If the Commission determines that there is probable cause to believe a “knowing and willful” violation as defined in 2 U.S.C. § 441j has occurred, it may refer the matter to the Attorney General for criminal prosecution without prior conciliation efforts, 2 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.