U.S. Code » Title 2 » Chapter CHAPTER 4— OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

2 U.S.C. § 92

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1977–1998 · leading case: Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228 (1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Davis v. Passman, 442 U.S. 228 (1979). · cites it 2× “See 2 U. S. C. § 92 . [3] The full text of Passman's letter is as follows: Dear Mrs.”
Shirley DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otto E. PASSMAN, Congressman of the United States, Defendant-Appellee, 571 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1978). · cites it 2× “The concept of due process encompasses virtually all of the civil liberties derived from the Constitution. While the fifth amendment Due Process Clause surely exists for the “especial bene *798 fit” of Davis, as Cort required, it does not exist with equal certainty to protect…”
Shirley DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otto E. PASSMAN, Congressman of the United States, Defendant-Appellee, 544 F.2d 865 (5th Cir. 1977). “With respect to the first point he correctly notes that the statute upon which his dismissal of Davis was predicated, *869 2 U.S.C. § 92 , is nondiscriminatory on its face; it allows dismissal of both male and female staff members with or without cause.”
Loe v. Armistead, 582 F.2d 1291 (4th Cir. 1978). “Indicative of this special *1295 relationship is 2 U.S.C. § 92 , which makes members of a congressman’s personal staff removable at any time with or without cause.”
United States v. Fenton, 10 F. Supp. 2d 501 (W.D. Pa. 1998). · cites it 2× “Under 2 U.S.C. § 92 , members of the House of Representatives are authorized to “employ not more than 18 permanent clerk hire employees.”
Bodenmiller v. Stanchfield, 557 F. Supp. 857 (E.D.N.Y 1983). · cites it 2× “Thus, Bodenmiller’s allegations concerning threats and intimidation under 42 U.”
Witty v. Jones, 563 F. Supp. 415 (D.D.C. 1983). “§ 60 -l(a)(2) (officers of Congress have authority to remove any employee under their supervision); Rules 14-A and 14-C of the Rules of Procedure of the Committee on House Administration, 97th Cong.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.