In order to offer an arrangement of types of aid, including institutional and State aid which best fits the needs of each individual student, an institution may (1) transfer a total of 25 percent of the institutions 11 So in original. Probably should be “institution’s”. allotment under section 1087bb of this title to the institution’s allotment under section 1070b–3 or 1087–52 of this title (or both); (2) transfer 25 percent of the institution’s allotment under section 1087–52 of this title to the institution’s allotment under section 1070b–3 or 1087bb of this title (or both); and (3) transfer 25 percent of the institution’s allotment under section 1070b–3 of this title to the institution’s allotment under section 1087–52 of this title. Funds transferred to an institution’s allotment under another section may be used as a part of and for the same purposes as funds allotted under that section. The Secretary shall have no control over such transfer, except as specifically authorized, except for the collection and dissemination of information.
Notes of Decisions
Johnson v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters, 256 F. App'x 481 (3rd Cir. 2007).
· cites it 2× “On March 9, 2007, the District Court entered a memorandum order granting the motion to dismiss because: (1) Johnson could not sustain a claim under 20 U.S.C. § 1095 (a) because the defendants (the union and its officers) did not employ Johnson; (2) Johnson could not sustain a…”
Savage v. Scales, 310 F. Supp. 2d 122 (D.D.C. 2004).
“Rather, they allege, because the NCSEAA proceeded pursuant to the federal statute, 20 U.S.C. § 1095 (a), it was authorized to garnish plaintiffs wages and there is no language in the statute that “assign[s] the borrower’s employer .”
Barron v. Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corp. (In Re Barron), 264 B.R. 833 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 2001).
“In late 1999, in an effort to collect the Travis County judgment, the TGSLC notified the Debtor that, unless she established a written repayment agreement on or before February 12, 2000, the TGSLC would begin the process of garnishing her wages pursuant to the provisions of 20 U.”
Pelfrey v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp., 71 F. Supp. 2d 1161 (N.D. Ala. 1999).
“(3) Guaranty agencies are required to contact a debtor’s employer to pursue administrative wage garnishment under 20 U.S.C. § 1095 (a). However, the guarantor’s mentioning of a debt in communicating with the employer as a third party could violate 15 U.”
Hoffman v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In re Hoffman), 557 B.R. 177 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2016).
“The Court agrees with ECMC that, pursuant to the applicable federal statutes and regulations, the entry of a decision in an Administrative Wage Garnishment Hearing held pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1095 (a) constitutes a final agency decision.”
Kort v. Diversified Collection Servs., Inc., 270 F. Supp. 2d 1017 (N.D. Ill. 2003).
“410 (b)(6), the FDCPA limits contacts that a debt collector may make with third parties, 15 U.S.C. § 1692b(3). Finally, while the HEA requires a contractor performing garnishment services on behalf of a loan guarantor to contact a debtor’s employer to pursue administrative wage…”
City Bank Farmers' Trust Co. v. United States, 5 F. Supp. 871 (S.D.N.Y. 1934).
“* * * ” Section 303 (a) (3) of the act, 20 USCA § 1095 note. In submitting a return on the estate, the petitioner claimed as a deduction the present value of these two remainders bequeathed to the hospital.”
United Student Aid Funds v. Prodanis, 2008 DNH 108 (D.N.H. 2008).
“See 20 U.S.C. § 1095 (a). Once an employer has been served with a wage withholding order by a guaranty agency, it is obligated to withhold a percentage of the wages due to the employee referenced in the order.”
Nicholas v. Alltran Educ., Inc (N.D. Ill. 2019).
“Department of Education] can issue an order to your employer directing them to withhold up to 15% of your disposable pay to be paid to ED to apply to your defaulted debt(s).”
Rourke-Rodriguez (N.D.N.Y. 2025).
“See 20 U.S.C. § 1095 (a)(5). Title IV of the Higher Education Act provides that, to receive federal student aid, a student must be: a citizen or national of the United States, a permanent resident of the United States, or able to provide evidence from the Immigration and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.