20 U.S.C. § 1099a

State responsibilities

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) State responsibilitiesAs part of the integrity program authorized by this part, each State, through one State agency or several State agencies selected by the State, shall—(1) furnish the Secretary, upon request, information with respect to the process for licensing or other authorization for institutions of higher education to operate within the State;(2) notify the Secretary promptly whenever the State revokes a license or other authority to operate an institution of higher education; and(3) notify the Secretary promptly whenever the State has credible evidence that an institution of higher education within the State—(A) has committed fraud in the administration of the student assistance programs authorized by this subchapter; or(B) has substantially violated a provision of this subchapter.(b) Institutional responsibility

Each institution of higher education shall provide evidence to the Secretary that the institution has authority to operate within a State at the time the institution is certified under subpart 3 of this part.

(Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, § 495, as added Pub. L. 105–244, title IV, § 491(2), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1758.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

Prior sections 1099a to 1099a–3 were omitted in the general amendment of this subpart by Pub. L. 105–244.

Section 1099a, Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, § 494, as added Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, § 499, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 635, authorized State postsecondary review program.

Section 1099a–1, Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, § 494A, as added Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, § 499, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 635, related to State postsecondary review entity agreements.

Section 1099a–2, Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, § 494B, as added Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, § 499, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 637, related to Federal reimbursement of State postsecondary review costs.

Section 1099a–3, Pub. L. 89–329, title IV, § 494C, as added Pub. L. 102–325, title IV, § 499, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 637; amended Pub. L. 103–208, § 2(i)(1), (2), Dec. 20, 1993, 107 Stat. 2478, related to functions of State review entities.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1994–2001 · leading case: United States v. Am. Bar Ass'n, 135 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2001).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Am. Bar Ass'n, 135 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2001). “The DOEd evaluated the ABA’s accreditation procedures, particularly in light of 20 U.S.C. § 1099a(a)(3), (b) and 34 C.F.R.”

Untitled California Attorney Gen. Opinion (Cal. Att'y Gen. 1994). “ANALYSIS The state postsecondary review program was established by Congress as part of the 1992 reauthorization of the Higher Education Act (20 U.S.C. § 1099a et seq.). The program is intended to ensure accountability of those postsecondary institutions within each state that…”

— 20 U.S.C. § 1099a(a)(3) — 1 case

United States v. Am. Bar Ass'n, 135 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2001). “The DOEd evaluated the ABA’s accreditation procedures, particularly in light of 20 U.S.C. § 1099a(a)(3), (b) and 34 C.F.R.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.