20 U.S.C. § 112

Enforcement of section 111

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

It shall be the duty of the proper officers in control of any school described in section 111 of this title to enforce the provisions of this chapter; and any such officer, school director, committee, superintendent, or teacher who shall refuse or neglect to comply with the requirements of this chapter, or shall neglect or fail to make proper provisions for the instruction required and in the manner specified by section 111 of this title, for all pupils in each and every school under his jurisdiction, shall be removed from office, and the vacancy filled as in other cases.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1937–1958 · leading case: Comm'r of Internal Revenue v. Kitselman, 89 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1937).
Comm'r of Internal Revenue v. Kitselman, 89 F.2d 458 (7th Cir. 1937). “Some have found a reorganization to exist, and others have found the factual situation to be such as to fall without the purview of the reorganization defined by said statute.”
Paul M. Davis & Augusta S. Davis v. United States, 255 F.2d 48 (6th Cir. 1958). “” 20 U.S.C.A. § 112 (c). 2 . “(1) The term ‘reorganization’ means (A) a statutory merger or consolidation, or (B) the acquisition by one corporation, in exchange solely for all or a part of its voting stock, of at least 80 per centum of the voting stock and at least 80 per…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.